Originally posted by DodgyAgent
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Age discrimination
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Age discrimination"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View PostThat's me flipped too.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostOld workers should be discriminated against
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by swamp View PostI blame the employment tribunal. Also companies have no spine and cave in rather than face her in court. They should sue her for fraud.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
that's me fliped
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostOld workers should be discriminated against
that's me fecked
Leave a comment:
-
Good luck to her. She is doing us oldies a favour by highlighting rampant age discrimination.
Leave a comment:
-
Phrases
Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostIsn't the point that if her date of birth was omitted then how could the clients have age-discriminated against her, as they didn't know her age?
Fact is these companies should have binned her for a rubbish CV and gone to the tribunal. However, when the costs exceed a payoff it makes commercial sense to stump up the payoff.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by swamp View Postthe 50-year-old's CV was littered with spelling mistakes and did not include her date of birth.
Leave a comment:
-
I blame the employment tribunal. Also companies have no spine and cave in rather than face her in court. They should sue her for fraud.
Leave a comment:
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: