• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "So it was our fault all along"

Collapse

  • shaunbhoy
    replied
    Originally posted by tay View Post
    The names of 2 of the accused are still under name suppression, not sure it is a good idea to spout them.

    The lodgers name is not under court suppression.
    Well, I am sure it won't be long before they get to appreciate at first hand just what they subjected that poor child to during his brief life. Name suppression or not. The "razor blades" thing was starting to sound quite appropriate to me!

    Leave a comment:


  • tay
    replied
    The names of 2 of the accused are still under name suppression, not sure it is a good idea to spout them.

    The lodgers name is not under court suppression.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Still:

    Mr Owen is reportedly being held in a special wing for his own protection at Wandsworth prison, in south-west London, after being switched from Brixton where an alleged plot was uncovered to attack him with razor blades.
    linky

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    For at least one whistleblower, they not only smeared her rep, they initiated a social services investigation into her own daughter, which could allow those she blew the whistle on to have her daughter taken away from her.
    Yes, some seriously evil bastards on both sides of the desk there. Well, one lot is in jail, the other lot should at least lose their jobs, immediately.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    And I believe their professional reputation was deliberately smeared such that they had to resign (so my GF told me and she reads the Torygraph so it must be true)
    For at least one whistleblower, they not only smeared her rep, they initiated a social services investigation into her own daughter, which could allow those she blew the whistle on to have her daughter taken away from her.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by Purple Dalek View Post
    One real cause is that there were several whistle-blowers, and they informed the very top people, but they were forcibly shut-up.
    And I believe their professional reputation was deliberately smeared such that they had to resign (so my GF told me and she reads the Torygraph so it must be true)

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenophon
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Funny, I thought it was these people who caused the death of "Baby P"

    <names removed>

    I certainly know that I wasn't involved.
    WHS
    Last edited by ferret; 20 November 2008, 13:24. Reason: names removed

    Leave a comment:


  • Purple Dalek
    replied
    Anyone using IT as an excuse in all this ought to be tarred and feathered.

    If the system was crap then people will have noticed long ago, and said something.

    One real cause is that there were several whistle-blowers, and they informed the very top people, but they were forcibly shut-up.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Tested by amateurs.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    I was kind of agreeing with the Prof. until this qoute:

    “One assumes that Baby P's records in ICS were complete and up-to-date, but the complex sense-making that may have saved him could have been compromised as a result.”

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Funny, I thought it was these people who caused the death of "Baby P"

    <no names please>

    I certainly know that I wasn't involved.
    Last edited by ferret; 20 November 2008, 13:11. Reason: names removed

    Leave a comment:


  • zara_backdog
    replied
    Hum - introduced in 2005 - so it only took the users nearly 3 years to find out it did not work!

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    started a topic So it was our fault all along

    So it was our fault all along

    http://www.contractoruk.com/news/004082.html

    ...and not the incompetant twonks that visited the kid 60 times.

    Well, glad we got to the bottom of that one then.

Working...
X