Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
The names of 2 of the accused are still under name suppression, not sure it is a good idea to spout them.
The lodgers name is not under court suppression.
Well, I am sure it won't be long before they get to appreciate at first hand just what they subjected that poor child to during his brief life. Name suppression or not. The "razor blades" thing was starting to sound quite appropriate to me!
Mr Owen is reportedly being held in a special wing for his own protection at Wandsworth prison, in south-west London, after being switched from Brixton where an alleged plot was uncovered to attack him with razor blades.
For at least one whistleblower, they not only smeared her rep, they initiated a social services investigation into her own daughter, which could allow those she blew the whistle on to have her daughter taken away from her.
Yes, some seriously evil bastards on both sides of the desk there. Well, one lot is in jail, the other lot should at least lose their jobs, immediately.
And I believe their professional reputation was deliberately smeared such that they had to resign (so my GF told me and she reads the Torygraph so it must be true)
For at least one whistleblower, they not only smeared her rep, they initiated a social services investigation into her own daughter, which could allow those she blew the whistle on to have her daughter taken away from her.
One real cause is that there were several whistle-blowers, and they informed the very top people, but they were forcibly shut-up.
And I believe their professional reputation was deliberately smeared such that they had to resign (so my GF told me and she reads the Torygraph so it must be true)
I was kind of agreeing with the Prof. until this qoute:
“One assumes that Baby P's records in ICS were complete and up-to-date, but the complex sense-making that may have saved him could have been compromised as a result.”
Leave a comment: