Originally posted by threaded
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Must see TV for the scientists amongst us"
Collapse
-
plane tit: Hey, I made that up all on my own. I'm quite proud of it. Made me chuckle.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks for clearing that up Threaded. I'm sure it's hard for you to find time to solve these mysteries when you have better things to do like drive Lambos and shag lady diplomats.
Leave a comment:
-
DimPrawn: It is not really a paradox. What Hawking did was try to combine a model of the small scale: quantum mechanics, with with a model of the large scale: relativity, using a mathematical technique developed by Penrose.
So essentially you have a probabilty system shoe horned into a limits system using a platonist system.
Small wonder it is all a little confused.
When they dump quantum mechanics for something better it will be so obvious: the information is not lost, it stays there, and just cannot be seen.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Lucifer BoxComic book guy, of course. Here he is at the Ambassador's party...

Oh no!!!! I actually understand the shirt!
Leave a comment:
-
Say no more...Originally posted by The Lone GunmanYes but who is the brains of the outfit. The guy in the chair is a remote controled front.Who is driving him?
Leave a comment:
-
Comic book guy, of course. Here he is at the Ambassador's party...Originally posted by wendigo100BTW, threaded was on the Simpsons? What sort of character did he play?
Leave a comment:
-
BTW, threaded was on the Simpsons? What sort of character did he play?
Waylon Smithers!
Leave a comment:
-
Is this Hawking's recent volte face, where he now believes that not all information is lost when something enters a black hole? I seem to remember him announcing this during the past year, which flew against the model he had developed over the previous 25 years.
BTW, threaded was on the Simpsons? What sort of character did he play?
Leave a comment:
-
Yes but who is the brains of the outfit. The guy in the chair is a remote controled front.Who is driving him?
Leave a comment:
-
...and "The Simpsons"!Originally posted by zeitghostHe appeared on StarTrek, what more do you need to know?
Leave a comment:
-
Must see TV for the scientists amongst us
BBC2, 9.00pm Tonight:
Does Stephen Hawking's celebrity outweigh his real contribution to science? That's the question at the heart of this deep, deep film. That and lots of near-unfathomable questions about black holes. The biggest of which is whether they don't just eat up space and time, but information, too - a shocking theory that Hawking maintained for 30 years. If his "information paradox" were true, we're told, all that science holds dear would fly out of the window. Which is why Hawking's rivals have tried for years to disprove it, and apparently succeeded. Only now, Hawking, frailer than ever, is fighting back with a new hole theory. It's a heroic story, and the film does an admirable job with the daunting physics, giving us a taste of big ideas but never overtaxing us. You just hope Hawking lives long enough to bring off one last coup.
Threaded need not watch, he knows the answer already.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Today 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Yesterday 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58
- Andy Burnham is PM: 5 new IT policies set to shape UK tech and its contractors Jul 20 06:29
- Taxed on money I haven't earned yet? Bold move, HMRC Jul 17 08:36
- The Fair Work Agency has got zero hours in its sights. Do you? Jul 16 08:44
- Cookie Policy Jul 15 11:50

Leave a comment: