• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Must see TV for the scientists amongst us"

Collapse

  • The Late, Great JC
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded
    plane tit: Hey, I made that up all on my own. I'm quite proud of it. Made me chuckle.
    Tiny things... etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    plane tit: Hey, I made that up all on my own. I'm quite proud of it. Made me chuckle.

    Leave a comment:


  • planetit
    replied
    Took you a while to Google that Threaded.

    3/10 - must try harder.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Thanks for clearing that up Threaded. I'm sure it's hard for you to find time to solve these mysteries when you have better things to do like drive Lambos and shag lady diplomats.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    DimPrawn: It is not really a paradox. What Hawking did was try to combine a model of the small scale: quantum mechanics, with with a model of the large scale: relativity, using a mathematical technique developed by Penrose.

    So essentially you have a probabilty system shoe horned into a limits system using a platonist system.

    Small wonder it is all a little confused.

    When they dump quantum mechanics for something better it will be so obvious: the information is not lost, it stays there, and just cannot be seen.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • The Late, Great JC
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucifer Box
    Comic book guy, of course. Here he is at the Ambassador's party...


    Oh no!!!! I actually understand the shirt!

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman
    Yes but who is the brains of the outfit. The guy in the chair is a remote controled front.Who is driving him?
    Say no more...

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by wendigo100
    BTW, threaded was on the Simpsons? What sort of character did he play?
    Comic book guy, of course. Here he is at the Ambassador's party...

    Leave a comment:


  • The Late, Great JC
    replied
    BTW, threaded was on the Simpsons? What sort of character did he play?


    Waylon Smithers!

    Leave a comment:


  • wendigo100
    replied
    Is this Hawking's recent volte face, where he now believes that not all information is lost when something enters a black hole? I seem to remember him announcing this during the past year, which flew against the model he had developed over the previous 25 years.

    BTW, threaded was on the Simpsons? What sort of character did he play?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Yes but who is the brains of the outfit. The guy in the chair is a remote controled front.Who is driving him?

    Leave a comment:


  • The Late, Great JC
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    He appeared on StarTrek, what more do you need to know?
    ...and "The Simpsons"!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    started a topic Must see TV for the scientists amongst us

    Must see TV for the scientists amongst us

    BBC2, 9.00pm Tonight:

    Does Stephen Hawking's celebrity outweigh his real contribution to science? That's the question at the heart of this deep, deep film. That and lots of near-unfathomable questions about black holes. The biggest of which is whether they don't just eat up space and time, but information, too - a shocking theory that Hawking maintained for 30 years. If his "information paradox" were true, we're told, all that science holds dear would fly out of the window. Which is why Hawking's rivals have tried for years to disprove it, and apparently succeeded. Only now, Hawking, frailer than ever, is fighting back with a new hole theory. It's a heroic story, and the film does an admirable job with the daunting physics, giving us a taste of big ideas but never overtaxing us. You just hope Hawking lives long enough to bring off one last coup.


    Threaded need not watch, he knows the answer already.

Working...
X