• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Understanding the IT contractor market"

Collapse

  • Churchill
    replied
    To be honest I'd rather the agents knew about their business rather than mine. If they require help regarding their understanding of certain aspects of a particular role then I'm more than happy to help them.

    By helping an agent understand he/she will have a favourable view about my knowledge in that particular area.

    Agents are good as middlemen, they open up the opportunity, I close the deal.

    Simple as.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
    50% is a pass
    OS you are too kind

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    If only, well almost.
    50% is a pass

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by shoes View Post
    . My main issue with these 'recruitment consultants' is that they are often 18 years old and stupid. .

    If only, well almost.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by shoes View Post
    They need to know about opt in/out and what it means, they need to have a reasonable understanding of ir35 issues, they need to know the fundamentals of the role they are recruiting for.

    Nah, you can bypass training the monkeys if it's worth another fiver an hour to me. I'll sort out the 'paperwork' for myself.

    Leave a comment:


  • shoes
    replied
    Pay a bit more and hire people who have a vague idea of the world. My main issue with these 'recruitment consultants' is that they are often 18 years old and stupid. Worse than this is that they treat contractors who know their business better than they do as imbeciles, who will swallow any old bull. You're not selling a conservatory to an old woman here son.

    They need to know about opt in/out and what it means, they need to have a reasonable understanding of ir35 issues, they need to know the fundamentals of the role they are recruiting for.

    They also need to appreciate that a rate that sounds like a lot of money to them doesn't necessarily sound like a lot of money to a potential candidate.

    That's all I want. Someone with a fking clue. Stop 'streamlining' by adding an idiot who can barely work the phone to the 'process'.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    I'm sure you're capable of shafting them all by yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    I'm sure you're capable of shafting them all by yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Ah well, your loss.

    Surely it is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?

    Parting is such sweet sorrow.
    I am not sure that employing you to hump my best clients would be good for business.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    In that case, you must be blissfully happy.
    Unfortunately, not ignorant enough, despite my best efforts, or lack of.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Surely it is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?
    Surely it is better to have loved a midget than never to have loved atall?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Ignorance is bliss.
    In that case, you must be blissfully happy.

    Leave a comment:


  • PM-Junkie
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Ben Dover
    ...no, it was his assistant - Phil McCavity

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Surely it is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?

    Ignorance is bliss.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    And to think, I nearly tried to persuade Churchill to come and work for me
    Ah well, your loss.

    Surely it is better to have loved and lost than never to have loved at all?

    Parting is such sweet sorrow.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X