• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "John Major in The Times"

Collapse

  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    Tell that to Johnathan Aitken.
    He's teetotal, so I don't think it'd be polite to do so.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    Small beer.
    Tell that to Johnathan Aitken.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by TheFaQQer View Post
    And a certain amount of corruption, e.g. taking cash from dodgy shopkeepers to ask questions; taking bribes from the Saudis in return for arms deals, which contrasted with the law.
    Small beer.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by zathras View Post
    There may have been a large dollop of sexual shenanigans going on under the Major Government and this contrasted with the 'Back to Basics' policy that he tried to launch.
    And a certain amount of corruption, e.g. taking cash from dodgy shopkeepers to ask questions; taking bribes from the Saudis in return for arms deals, which contrasted with the law.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    The seemed awfully quiet in opposition to me. Except when they gave Blair a great big standing ovation that is.
    What could they do? "Hey, Brown, put the brakes on private borrowing; cool the housing market." NO CHANCE! The whole "I'll be a millionaire, like Dim Prawn!" fantasy had ripped through the entire country... even Northern Ireland!!! They'd have looked crap, and "We Told You So" wouldn't have made the voters feel better about themselves.

    I think.

    What are you asking me for?

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Don't know what he's got to complain about. The impending deflationary period will bring down the price of peas...

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    the question is would the Tories have done things any different in the last 12 years?
    The seemed awfully quiet in opposition to me. Except when they gave Blair a great big standing ovation that is.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Doggy Styles View Post
    So are we saying Gordon Brown was a fairly useless chancellor then? OK, how useless?

    1. Was he the most useless economic minister in the developed world over those ten years?

    2. Was he the most useless chancellor Britain has ever had?

    3. Or is he merely occupying a UEFA Cup position in those league tables?

    I need to know, so I can improve my metaphors.

    YES
    YES
    YES

    the question is would the Tories have done things any different in the last 12 years?

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Platypus View Post
    Aren't your 4-bed house with large equity and £250 mortgage payment legacy enough for you?

    I would have thought you'd be pleased?
    You have to understand that he earned everything he has. None of it is at all due to Labour's handling of the economy.

    Rule of thumb:
    During Conservative governments,
    good things are the result of Tory policies,
    bad things are hangovers from the previous Labour administration, or the cost of cleaning up its mess.

    During Labour governments,
    invert above.

    Leave a comment:


  • Platypus
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    So when are Labour EVER going to leave a legacy that is worth having ?
    Aren't your 4-bed house with large equity and £250 mortgage payment legacy enough for you?

    I would have thought you'd be pleased?

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    John Major is probably well-placed to give Gordon Brown advice. A minor figure following a greater, always in the shadow, starting well but failing in the end.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why should I read anything that moron writes? He p**sed away (saint)Thatcher's legacy. Almost everything I dislike about Liebour was introduced by Major then extended by Liebour.

    It wont make any difference who wins the next election - their policies are almost the same.


    So when are Labour EVER going to leave a legacy that is worth having ? All they ever leave is massive debt and worldwide ridicule.

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why should I read anything that moron writes? He p**sed away (saint)Thatcher's legacy. Almost everything I dislike about Liebour was introduced by Major then extended by Liebour.

    It wont make any difference who wins the next election - their policies are almost the same.
    There may have been a large dollop of sexual shenanigans going on under the Major Government and this contrasted with the 'Back to Basics' policy that he tried to launch. However the economic legacy that Labour inherited was created under the Major/Clarke years. Further it was John Major who took over the running of the economy at the tail end of Mrs Thatcher's reign as PM and is therefore perfectly experienced to advise how to get out of the current recession.

    Leave a comment:


  • Alf W
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Why should I read anything that moron writes? He p**sed away (saint)Thatcher's legacy. Almost everything I dislike about Liebour was introduced by Major then extended by Liebour.

    It wont make any difference who wins the next election - their policies are almost the same.

    Surely satan

    Leave a comment:


  • Doggy Styles
    replied
    So are we saying Gordon Brown was a fairly useless chancellor then? OK, how useless?

    1. Was he the most useless economic minister in the developed world over those ten years?

    2. Was he the most useless chancellor Britain has ever had?

    3. Or is he merely occupying a UEFA Cup position in those league tables?

    I need to know, so I can improve my metaphors.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X