Originally posted by Liability
View Post
The main reason for not invdaing Iraq after the UN backed expulsion from Kuwait was that amounted to not only a breach of the UN mandate but more seriously Iraq at that time had an arsenal of chemical weapons that would have inflicted severe casualites on any invader - not to mention the possiblity of devastating Israel with Chemical Tipped SKUD missiles.
Instead over a period of a decade the UN dimsmantled Iraqs chemical and biologial capabilites not to the extent where the country could not resist the invasion of 2003.
However Saddam could have been removed from power in a far better way - Iran made a UN resolution in 2002 to order compulsary free elections in Iraq - and any meddling by the Baathists would have resulted in a UN intervention including Arab forces.
The USA vetoed this method and rather embarked upon a brutal invasion and occupation - there was a better way to achieve the removal of Saddam without the subsequent tragic and enormous loss of life.
Leave a comment: