• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Brazen political polemic"

Collapse

  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    That's the one, I couldn't remember which "airport economics book" it was, I'm a sucker for buying them...
    So I'm not the only sucker who bought it at an airport

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by themistry View Post
    Freakanomics, good book

    TM
    That's the one, I couldn't remember which "airport economics book" it was, I'm a sucker for buying them...

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by themistry View Post
    Freakanomics, good book

    TM
    crap

    Leave a comment:


  • themistry
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    I read an economic article recently that suggested the cause and effect of cash in an election is not as obvious.

    It seemed to suggest that the winning candidate received more money but not that the candidate with the most money wins. The evidence seemed pretty convincing on the surface.

    Freakanomics, good book

    TM

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    ...
    Now then, Mr McCain seems an honourable chap, brave war hero and all that, but I can’t help thinking that there’s a dose of stupidity in his years of public service. My grandfathers both went to war, got their medals and were undeniably brave men, but it turned them into pacifists. Both were pretty schocked when my Dad joined the army, and the one remaining grandfather is very pleased that I’ve never volunteered to put my ass in the way of bullets, because he’s seen what it does to people.

    In short, I wouldn’t want as president a guy who has been through all the horrors of war yet puts across a message that young people should go and join the army. I share the view of Wilfred Owen;

    If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
    Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
    And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
    His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;
    If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
    Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
    Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
    Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,
    My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
    To children ardent for some desperate glory,
    The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est
    Pro patria mori
    .

    Right then, back to the laughing and joking.
    That's probably why my dad never had any exciting or funny stories to tell about action in WWII until his kids were all too old to join up. Then he had loads of them.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    I am so glad you said that, I thought it was just me being mean!!! I saw him do it last night and he just looked like some old Grandad trying to be cool!
    Every time I see McCain I think of the “It’s” man at the beginning of Monty Python. He is a walking, well, hobbling, casualty ward. The man has some bizarre injury that means he can’t lift his arms above shoulder height. That’s because when he got burnt to a cinder at war, he went back for more and got shot down. Eventually, he was captured by the enemy and spent years of starvation and torture in a PoW camp, and refused the offer of the enemy to go home early, saying he didn’t want to leave his mates behind. Obviously the Vietcong were tiring of his political speeches and wanted to be rid of him, but he was having none of it. Having witnessed and even suffered all the horrors of war, he joined the Republican party and supported sending lots more young chappies and chappesses to get their asses blown apart in wars. He has three sons who all joined the navy, one of whom is now fighting in Iraq, and will, in about 20 years time, turn up on the stage at a Republican party conference, probably even more mutilated than his Dad, to launch his campaign for the presidency.

    Now then, Mr McCain seems an honourable chap, brave war hero and all that, but I can’t help thinking that there’s a dose of stupidity in his years of public service. My grandfathers both went to war, got their medals and were undeniably brave men, but it turned them into pacifists. Both were pretty schocked when my Dad joined the army, and the one remaining grandfather is very pleased that I’ve never volunteered to put my ass in the way of bullets, because he’s seen what it does to people.

    In short, I wouldn’t want as president a guy who has been through all the horrors of war yet puts across a message that young people should go and join the army. I share the view of Wilfred Owen;

    If in some smothering dreams you too could pace
    Behind the wagon that we flung him in,
    And watch the white eyes writhing in his face,
    His hanging face, like a devil's sick of sin;
    If you could hear, at every jolt, the blood
    Come gargling from the froth-corrupted lungs,
    Obscene as cancer, bitter as the cud
    Of vile, incurable sores on innocent tongues,
    My friend, you would not tell with such high zest
    To children ardent for some desperate glory,
    The old Lie; Dulce et Decorum est
    Pro patria mori.

    Right then, back to the laughing and joking.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Imagine America with immigrants destroying the indigenous culture.

    Yours
    Chief Cybertory speak with forked tongue

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    But a candidate with little money won't win, which is counter to my understanding of democracy
    I think the point is, a candidate who does not have enough support, will:
    a) not raise much money, and
    b) not win.

    One is not causing the other.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    I read an economic article recently that suggested the cause and effect of cash in an election is not as obvious.

    It seemed to suggest that the winning candidate received more money but not that the candidate with the most money wins. The evidence seemed pretty convincing on the surface.


    But a candidate with little money won't win, which is counter to my understanding of democracy

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    I think they have a system where you won't win unless:

    a/ you keep mentioning God
    b/ you are good out soundbites
    c/ you are bankrolled to the tune of tens of millions

    The American system, the utimate triumpth of style over substance
    I read an economic article recently that suggested the cause and effect of cash in an election is not as obvious.

    It seemed to suggest that the winning candidate received more money but not that the candidate with the most money wins. The evidence seemed pretty convincing on the surface.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    ...............
    The American system, the utimate triumpth of style over substance
    But is there a better one? You know Obama's campaign had massive funding from people making individual contributions to a cause they believe in. Think that would happen in the UK? And religion is an integral part of American life, and politics.

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    Fonzie
    Oh

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by cailin maith View Post
    I am so glad you said that, I thought it was just me being mean!!! I saw him do it last night and he just looked like some old Grandad trying to be cool!
    Fonzie

    Leave a comment:


  • cailin maith
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    Is it just me that thought John McCain looked a nobber when he did that double thumbs up thing?

    I am so glad you said that, I thought it was just me being mean!!! I saw him do it last night and he just looked like some old Grandad trying to be cool!

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Let's hope that he doesn't raid American pensions, allow mass immigration, implement stupid Human Rights laws and put up taxes to an unsustainable level.
    Imagine America with immigrants destroying the indigenous culture.

    Yours
    Chief Cybertory speak with forked tongue

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X