Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Rate cuts should have happened months ago"
I always wondered why they bothered having blanchflower, they could have replaced him with a simple program:
If inflation < target then vote for rate cut
If inflation > target then vote for rate cut
If economy doing well then vote for rate cut
If economy doing badly then vote for rate cut
thinking you're like Blanchflower is something I wouldn't go around broadcasting.
Blanchflower has been voting for rate cuts for 10 consecutive months because he could see a recession looming. Leaving rates at the current relative high level to the US etc has been highly damaging to the economy, and the consequences are now there for all to see.
Leave a comment: