• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Icelandic petition 'We Are not terroists'"

Collapse

  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Although your post was I do think that GB has treated the Icelandic banks disgracefully


    You would, but the Icelandic government reneged on customer deposit guarantees and got what they deserved.

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I think the free cod deal was a better idea
    Captain Birds Eye may disagree.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    I think the free cod deal was a better idea
    Yes, then we can feed the bankers rotten mackerel.
    Last edited by Mich the Tester; 23 October 2008, 15:13.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    I would happily support using terror legislation to grab thieving bastards like Richard Fuld who took huge bonuses while bankrupting their employers and thoroughly fooking the world’s economy. Maybe it’s time for Britain to use ‘extraordinary rendition’ tactics to drag irresponsible bank directors off to some Grottistan with no human rights and give them a bit of ‘enhanced interrogation’.
    I think the free cod deal was a better idea

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    I would happily support using terror legislation to grab thieving bastards like Richard Fuld who took huge bonuses while bankrupting their employers and thoroughly fooking the world’s economy. Maybe it’s time for Britain to use ‘extraordinary rendition’ tactics to drag irresponsible bank directors off to some Grottistan with no human rights and give them a bit of ‘enhanced interrogation’.

    Leave a comment:


  • KentPhilip
    replied
    Why don't they launch a petition on the number-10 site?

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Just because the legislation used has the word terrorism in its title does not mean it was used against terrorists (though I think it was anti terror clauses that were used). That is just bluster from Icelandic ministers to gain sympathy and throw the trail off them.
    The freeze on assets was only announced after Iceland announced it would not be protecting foreign money in its banks and that it would be defaulting on loans it had with other countries.
    Hardly the actions of a friendly ally with good intentions.
    So if they give us all their fishing rights it’ll all be alright?

    Oh, and perhaps some free electricity from their geothermal generators; they can borrow the money to pay for the cable..

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Originally posted by Mich the Tester View Post
    Agreed that it was typical NuLabour bullying to use terrorism legislation, but that’s what they do to everybody these days; remember Walter Wolfgang?
    Just because the legislation used has the word terrorism in its title does not mean it was used against terrorists (though I think it was anti terror clauses that were used). That is just bluster from Icelandic ministers to gain sympathy and throw the trail off them.
    The freeze on assets was only announced after Iceland announced it would not be protecting foreign money in its banks and that it would be defaulting on loans it had with other countries.
    Hardly the actions of a friendly ally with good intentions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Because Iceland is a member of NATO and an ally of the British. They are a very pro British nation. Using anti terror legislation to conduct a knee jerk reaction is appalling (and I hope all you who favour ID cards are looking at this). What Brown did was to effectively bankcrupt Iceland. No attempt oir little attempt has been made to discuss matters and find a way through the problem.
    Brown is a Clunking fist Bully who would not have done this to a bank of a larger more powerful nation.
    Agreed that it was typical NuLabour bullying to use terrorism legislation, but that’s what they do to everybody these days; remember Walter Wolfgang?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by rootsnall View Post
    Why ?

    They were about to go under and we grabbed the money unlike with BCCI were the yanks grabbed the money and the UK account holders got nowt.

    I know Cybertory thinks Northern Crock were a going concern flush with spare cash but with both this shower of tulip and the Icelandic banks they had had it with or without GB.
    Because Iceland is a member of NATO and an ally of the British. They are a very pro British nation. Using anti terror legislation to conduct a knee jerk reaction is appalling (and I hope all you who favour ID cards are looking at this). What Brown did was to effectively bankcrupt Iceland. No attempt oir little attempt has been made to discuss matters and find a way through the problem.
    Brown is a Clunking fist Bully who would not have done this to a bank of a larger more powerful nation.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenophon
    replied
    Originally posted by Bumfluff View Post
    Agreed my grammer was poor
    I'm gonna assume your error here was on purpose.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    If the Icelanders can be forced to provide us all with free cod for the rest of our lives I’m sure we could iron out any diplomatic difficulties.

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Although your post was I do think that GB has treated the Icelandic banks disgracefully
    Why ?

    They were about to go under and we grabbed the money unlike with BCCI were the yanks grabbed the money and the UK account holders got nowt.

    I know Cybertory thinks Northern Crock were a going concern flush with spare cash but with both this shower of tulip and the Icelandic banks they had had it with or without GB.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    Although your post was I do think that GB has treated the Icelandic banks disgracefully
    Yep, putting all that taxpayers’ money was particularly cruel.

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Although your post was I do think that GB has treated the Icelandic banks disgracefully

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X