• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "timely coincidence or not?"

Collapse

  • Paddy
    replied
    The word paedophilia refers to pre-pubic children. There also seems to be confusion with nakedness and pornography. If nakedness is an issue then many renaissance panting need to be removed from London Art Galleries.
    As much I as I dislike the muslin religion they don’t marry kids apart from Mohamed and some remote villagers in some third world countries.
    Child porn is abhorrent and if evidence is planted then those who plant it should be punish in the same way as the accused.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Paedophilia is not illegal in muslim countries. It's quite normal for a middle-aged man to marry a very young girl.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Why would they use kiddie porn when it is being chased by every copper in the world.
    Photobucket would be a more sensible place to hide as there are billions of pics posted by millions of users.

    Smells fishy to me.
    With reference to usenet, where hordes of porn images are posted anonymously, why would terrorists use *any* porn. Serious collectors (so I've heard) have automated downloaders that check for dups. So binary differences in what look like identical images of almost equal size would soon arouse suspicion and perhaps irritation enough to investigate closer.

    Mind you, that's not to say the average porn hound, or even the vast majority, would be in a position to analyze the differences more closely. But it would make people wonder, especially if the porn appeared to originate from Muslim countries!

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    Why would they use kiddie porn when it is being chased by every copper in the world.
    Photobucket would be a more sensible place to hide as there are billions of pics posted by millions of users.

    Smells fishy to me.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Planted kiddie porn is plod’s plan B if they can’t nick the poor soul for anything else. After the courts wised up to planted drugs, the police moved on to other means to get a conviction.

    Leave a comment:


  • stingman123
    replied
    Shouldn't you be buying us some more banks?

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    started a topic timely coincidence or not?

    timely coincidence or not?

    Link found between terrorism and paedophilia. Apparently steganography is being used by terrorists, planting data in paedo images.

    If you check the comments out, most people are connecting this to the new database announced by the NL Stasi and, tbh, that did cross my mind as I read it.

    Food for thought anyroad...

Working...
X