• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Jacqui Smith - biggest threat to liberty in the UK"

Collapse

  • Mich the Tester
    replied
    12 billion pounds? That’ll quickly end up being 100 billion plus judging by previous government projects.

    Now then; here’s a question of conscience considering the market right now; if you have the opportunity to work on this project at a good rate and there isn’t another contract immediately available, would you do it?

    I’m a tester, as you might have guessed by my name. I’m vehemently opposed to this kind of system, for both principled and technical reasons (too many to list).

    A tester who works on the project would have to live with his conscience, but it would also provide an opportunity to find the bugs which could make people’s lives seriously tulip. On the other hand, if a tester refuses he might face a long time out of a contract, but with a clear conscience.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sysman
    replied
    In fact this slipped out over a week ago, and if you hadn't been on the lookout for them burying bad news in the reporting of the financial crisis you could be forgiven for missing it:

    Government will spy on every call and e-mail

    From The Sunday Times
    October 5, 2008
    Government will spy on every call and e-mail
    David Leppard

    Ministers are considering spending up to £12 billion on a database to monitor and store the internet browsing habits, e-mail and telephone records of everyone in Britain.

    GCHQ, the government’s eavesdropping centre, has already been given up to £1 billion to finance the first stage of the project.

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    They'll be monitoring subversive internet forums next...

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    More info here:

    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/new...cle4951864.ece

    I trust that using any form of encryption without a government issued licence will be an arrestable offence.

    Labour for bringing order and harmony to our lives.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    A point to consider is when the data base goes wrong or the scanning software is poorly written.

    In the early 90s I was working with some database software for doctors practice and I was horrified to discover that unless the database was re-indexed after a crash; the wrong prescription would be associated with the wrong patient.

    Email scanners can get it wrong like the infamous innocent email to a council about an erection of a shed.

    Websense is an example of a poorly written Internet filter, it programmes like that are used there will be many mistakes.

    I had a court case once with a property dispute, a lot of my personal information was produced in court that could have only been obtained illegally through a bank clerk and the Inland Revenue. Hence I do not trust anyone least of all the government with any data or data collection.
    It's already happening - a bloke had his car seized at the roadside for no insurance because of a cock up in the insurance database. He was insured to drive the car but didn't have all his papers available for inspection immediately.

    All these "nothing to hide" wonks obviously haven't tried dealing with the useless cretins that inhabit most of the Court, government etc admin. who assume if you're claiming something is wrong, you must be the next Ian Huntley.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    A point to consider is when the data base goes wrong or the scanning software is poorly written.

    In the early 90s I was working with some database software for doctors practice and I was horrified to discover that unless the database was re-indexed after a crash; the wrong prescription would be associated with the wrong patient.

    Email scanners can get it wrong like the infamous innocent email to a council about an erection of a shed.

    Websense is an example of a poorly written Internet filter, it programmes like that are used there will be many mistakes.

    I had a court case once with a property dispute, a lot of my personal information was produced in court that could have only been obtained illegally through a bank clerk and the Inland Revenue. Hence I do not trust anyone least of all the government with any data or data collection.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by Stan.goodvibes View Post
    Anyhoo, whats the big deal - you are already part of the Echelon programme, you know the one with the big golf balls at Menwith Hill http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/503224.stm
    "It sounds like science fiction, but it's true."

    Rather like the futuristic idea of TV cameras that can read car number plates and compute their average speed over a stretch of road.

    If this is what they do to stop people driving at 60 past a couple of bollards, what will they have up their sleeve when they really want to spy on you?

    Leave a comment:


  • Stan.goodvibes
    replied
    Sorry for a minute there i got confused because I thought Jaqui Smith was one of the original Charlies Angels, but it was 'Jaclyn Smith'. My bad.

    Anyhoo, whats the big deal - you are already part of the Echelon programme, you know the one with the big golf balls at Menwith Hill http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/503224.stm

    And have you seen the 'privacy' statement for Facebook (or My Space or even Google)? Replace 'Facebook' with 'Big Brother' in the small print and check out where your details are going...

    THEY know everything about you already

    *fade out with x-files theme*

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
    How about a nice big picture of a CCTV camera wrapped in tinsel.

    That should go down a treat.

    go on, I dare you!!!
    Someone curling one off onto a CCTV camera would be more appropriate I think.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by lilelvis2000 View Post
    Jacqui Smith is one paranoid beeatch. I think she believes everything the Police tell her. The Police who are institutionally racist and prejudgeist. No wonder they use spying on a small group as a reason to spy on us all. And we just go ahead and say okay - well, except for that chakrabarti woman.
    Smith also suffers from a crippling poverty of ambition - she thinks it's fine to advise people not to walk around their own capital alone at night and sees nothing wrong with that, nor does she show any apparent ambition to improve things.

    Leave a comment:


  • voodooflux
    replied
    Originally posted by SantaClaus View Post
    How about a nice big picture of a CCTV camera wrapped in tinsel.

    That should go down a treat.

    go on, I dare you!!!
    Excellent!

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Database!

    I think the money would be better invested in developing a mind probe.

    We could all have weekly check-ups then, to ensure that we are all conforming.

    Leave a comment:


  • SantaClaus
    replied
    Originally posted by voodooflux View Post
    My son came home from school this afternoon with a "letter from Jacqui" (she's our MP) asking for submissions to her Christmas card competition. Any takers?

    I suggested one of these.
    How about a nice big picture of a CCTV camera wrapped in tinsel.

    That should go down a treat.

    go on, I dare you!!!
    Last edited by SantaClaus; 15 October 2008, 19:57.

    Leave a comment:


  • lilelvis2000
    replied
    Jacqui Smith is one paranoid beeatch. I think she believes everything the Police tell her. The Police who are institutionally racist and prejudgeist. No wonder they use spying on a small group as a reason to spy on us all. And we just go ahead and say okay - well, except for that chakrabarti woman.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    The name of the holiday is often shortened to Xmas because Roman letter "X" resembles the Greek letter of chi, an abbreviation for Christ.
    Well, I never knew that. But why should I; I'm a Pagan and believe that they stole our Yule festival.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X