A nice read
http://www.uksa.org.uk/NorthernRock.htm
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Northern Rock
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Northern Rock"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Moscow Mule View PostI haven't lost any money through NR, but I can still see the BrownDarling collective are a bunch of devious shysters and I wouldn't put stealing a few banks from their shareholders beyond them.
GB's thought process (maybe )
Hmmm, where does all our GDP come from now we've no manufacturing base?
The city - ching!
How can I get my hands on all that filthy lucre?
Nationalisation? Yes, but they are too expensive...
I know, I'll run them down to almost nothing, then buy them - SORTED!.
Agreed!! ... and all with the help of a few well-timed leaks from HM Treasury to Robert Peston. This action in itself is illegal, and I am sure that HMG could be proved to be involved in insider trading.
Leave a comment:
-
I bought HBOS shares on the dip and sold on the rise one day a couple of weeks ago making a small profit.
I am mortgage free having sold my properties late 2006.
Please let me know when you guys are in difficulties - I'll make you a "fair" offer
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
I haven't lost any money through NR, but I can still see the BrownDarling collective are a bunch of devious shysters and I wouldn't put stealing a few banks from their shareholders beyond them.
GB's thought process (maybe )
Hmmm, where does all our GDP come from now we've no manufacturing base?
The city - ching!
How can I get my hands on all that filthy lucre?
Nationalisation? Yes, but they are too expensive...
I know, I'll run them down to almost nothing, then buy them - SORTED!.
Leave a comment:
-
Ah diddums lost money in the Rock. And he's too naive to see that the court case will not go his way. Also he owns a property which is rapidly devaluing.
Not very bright is our CyberCretin.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Bagpuss View PostYou just contracdicted yourself. How can the above success of the nationalised northern rock be a reason for not nationalising it?
The Rock was nationalised because HMG maintained that it was bust... it clearly was only a liquidity problem..... assets far exceed liabilities. This is evidence that the reasons for nationalisation were lies.
The Rock was paying penal interest on the loans it had from the BofE and was making a profit. Brown and Darling saw that if Branson or anybody else in the private sector took over, they, and not HMG, were going to make a fortune as the SP was a bombed out 90p.
HMG wanted to stealth tax the Rocks shareholders to fill their black hole(AND THEY STATE THIS: 'all profits should go to the taxpayer') and thus nationalised. This was THEFT from shareholders and will be proven in the courts starting in January.
HMG are offering ZERO to shareholders.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Cyberman View Post.... and the debt is now only 11.5 Billion, down BY 15.4 Billion in January, which is further proof that this is only a liquidity problem, and that the Rock should not have been nationalised. At this rate, the Rock will owe nothing by the end of next year.
http://www.citywire.co.uk/personal/-...=3953&ea=37608
Leave a comment:
-
.... and the debt is now only 11.5 Billion, down BY 15.4 Billion in January, which is further proof that this is only a liquidity problem, and that the Rock should not have been nationalised. At this rate, the Rock will owe nothing by the end of next year.
http://www.citywire.co.uk/personal/-...=3953&ea=37608
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TykeMerc View PostI may have missed it, how much did you lose speculating on Northern Rock shares CyberTroll?
Lost nothing yet!! The court cases start in January.
http://www.uksa.org.uk/NorthernRock.htm
Leave a comment:
-
I may have missed it, how much did you lose speculating on Northern Rock shares CyberTroll?
Leave a comment:
-
Basically, 14 Billion was wiped off deposits by HMG incompetence. Of course capital ratios were affected. That amount is what the Rock now owes the BofE. Says it all really!!
Thanks Gordon & Alastair !!
Leave a comment:
-
Assets including 125% mortgages in a falling housing market
Hmm, Interesting reading on the Rock's demise..
there remain a number of
areas of concern. Most significantly, the deterioration in the housing market and the broader economic
environment, coupled with the evident stresses on household budgets as a result of rising food and fuel prices,
have put pressure on the Company’s loan books. Residential arrears over 3 months have more than doubled
since the start of the year to 1.18% at the end of June, and the higher LTV end of the book is particularly
exposed to housing market deterioration.
Whilst this increase is partly attributable to the Company tightening
the application of its arrears capitalisation policy and the shrinking of the mortgage book, the underlying trend
is all too evident. The impact is also being felt on possessions. The number of properties in possession grew
from 2,215 at the start of the year to 3,710 by the end of June.
As indicated in the Plan, the Company was expected to make a substantial loss in 2008. Actual performance in
the first six months of 2008 shows a statutory loss before tax of £585.4 million.Last edited by Bagpuss; 14 October 2008, 20:50.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
- Micro-entity accounts: Overview, and how to file with HMRC Nov 6 09:27
Leave a comment: