• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "That figures..Iranian embassy terrorist allowed to stay in Britain"

Collapse

  • Cyberman
    replied
    Now we're starting to agree !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Heavens above, you really are scraping the barrel. Of course political asylum existed, but it was not forced on us to allow it for everybody that has broken our laws. 10% of our prisons are now filled with foreigners and we have to keep them in the UK when we release them because of this HR ACT. It is daft and so are you Sir.
    Bringing and case under the HRA is very difficult unless you can afford an expensive barrister. If there was no HRA then these cases would be taken to the European Court under the same sections as sited in the HRA. The alternative is to egress from the European Convention and The Hage Treaty. That of course will not happen.

    I believe that once a person has committed a terrorist act that he has broken the conditions for having refugee statues and he should be sent back to his own country.

    I would much rather see an overhaul of the Judicial system in the UK so theses cases do not get as far as Court. Any sensible country would just throw the guy and people like him out

    The down side in these cases is that the Labour government has actively interfered in the refugee status of terrorists and politicians from other countries escaping from justice. David Blunkett was a prime example of a politician who handed out British Passport to persons of “His own interest” To know the reasons why it is best to search in Google as I don’t want to be accused of being anti-semitic on this forum because that would be far from the truth.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    So there was no political asylum given to anyone prior to the HRA? Please go to the library today and do some reading

    Heavens above, you really are scraping the barrel. Of course political asylum existed, but it was not forced on us to allow it for everybody that has broken our laws. 10% of our prisons are now filled with foreigners and we have to keep them in the UK when we release them because of this HR ACT. It is daft and so are you Sir.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    If it had not been brought in there would not be any interpretation to consider, and thus the guy would be deported. Therefore the obvious solution is to abolish/repeal the Act of Parliament that the incompetent Blair introduced.
    So there was no political asylum given to anyone prior to the HRA? Please go to the library today and do some reading

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    It’s not the Human Rights Act that is at fault but the stupid and corrupt people who interpret the act for their own ends.

    The Iranian terrorist should be sent back to Iran. If Iran was giving asylum a terrorist wanted by the British there would be wide-spread condemnation. Already the UK seems to handing out asylum to terrorists and criminals like one would hand out sweeties. The USA is almost, but not as bad as the UK as they gave asylum to plane hijackers and bombers of Cuba


    If it had not been brought in there would not be any interpretation to consider, and thus the guy would be deported. Therefore the obvious solution is to abolish/repeal the Act of Parliament that the incompetent Blair introduced.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    I hope the Tories will repeal that stupid Human Rights Act that Tony Blair incorporated into British Law !!!! It was one of just many terrible decisions that he and his corrupt cronies made.
    It’s not the Human Rights Act that is at fault but the stupid and corrupt people who interpret the act for their own ends.

    The Iranian terrorist should be sent back to Iran. If Iran was giving asylum a terrorist wanted by the British there would be wide-spread condemnation. Already the UK seems to handing out asylum to terrorists and criminals like one would hand out sweeties. The USA is almost, but not as bad as the UK as they gave asylum to plane hijackers and bombers of Cuba

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    He may not be able to provide any; but, like I say, "one in ten", or one in a hundred. If it becomes normal practice then maybe one or two useful informants can slip through ...
    Then the whole system of freedom-for-info would be abused and we'd be fed rubbish.

    The system of locking them up until they die seems the best to me: better than hanging them, as that seems to be regarded as martyrdom by their invariably bearded pals.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    I hope the Tories will repeal that stupid Human Rights Act that Tony Blair incorporated into British Law !!!! It was one of just many terrible decisions that he and his corrupt cronies made.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    Not surprised in the least.
    This country is pathetic. I'm ashamed to be British these days, and disgusted with the namby pamby laws and useless government we have.

    >Diver in "Not British any more, just Welsh" mode<
    Have you been throwing stones?

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Not surprised in the least.
    This country is pathetic. I'm ashamed to be British these days, and disgusted with the namby pamby laws and useless government we have.

    >Diver in "Not British any more, just Welsh" mode<

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    Er, how much excellent info. will he be able to provide all these years on? ..
    He may not be able to provide any; but, like I say, "one in ten", or one in a hundred. If it becomes normal practice then maybe one or two useful informants can slip through ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot View Post
    Sometimes there's more to these things than meets the eye. If ex-terrorists being released, or just one in ten of them, have been "turned" then allowing them all to stay is a Good Thing if they can provide info on other terrorists.

    Mind you, for that very reason if I was in charge of a terrorist cell I wouldn't trust an ex-jailbird however earnest and committed they seemed.
    Er, how much excellent info. will he be able to provide all these years on? Only the latest bumming techniques and perhaps a revealing discourse on the use of phone cards as a currency.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Sometimes there's more to these things than meets the eye. If ex-terrorists being released, or just one in ten of them, have been "turned" then allowing them all to stay is a Good Thing if they can provide info on other terrorists.

    Mind you, for that very reason if I was in charge of a terrorist cell I wouldn't trust an ex-jailbird however earnest and committed they seemed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Perhaps the murdering turd could bunk-up with those nice Afghans who live for free in that $1.2M multi-bedroomed house in London? Then again, they have said that the house is a bit on the small side. Sometimes, I do wonder if a week of selective extermination might just do some good in the UK.

    Leave a comment:


  • contractor79
    replied
    stop being racist now



    see, I can be politically correct too.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X