• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "What happens if it just doesn't work...."

Collapse

  • AlfredJPruffock
    replied
    Originally posted by Stan.goodvibes View Post
    Its simple really - the banks lent too much money to people who couldn't pay it back, and after that big snafu their response now is to refuse to loan anyone any money no matter that the loans are guaranteed by the govt.

    Its almost like the ppl in charge of the banks are deliberately trying to take down the system *cue twilight zone music* I can't see any other explanation... unless! - the ppl running the banks are completely incompetent.

    Once again, I reiterate that the solution is to fire all banking management staff and replace them with trained monkeys. They could do no worse.

    In essence then outsource Banking Management to EDS ?

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by Stan.goodvibes View Post
    ........... I can't see any other explanation... unless! - the ppl running the banks are completely incompetent.
    .........
    Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large numbers. The World is largely driven by incompetence, stupidity and greed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Stan.goodvibes
    replied
    Its simple really - the banks lent too much money to people who couldn't pay it back, and after that big snafu their response now is to refuse to loan anyone any money no matter that the loans are guaranteed by the govt.

    Its almost like the ppl in charge of the banks are deliberately trying to take down the system *cue twilight zone music* I can't see any other explanation... unless! - the ppl running the banks are completely incompetent.

    Once again, I reiterate that the solution is to fire all banking management staff and replace them with trained monkeys. They could do no worse.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by contractor79 View Post
    something tells me it won't work and they will need to put more in
    WHS

    It could take years for things to recover....

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Atw, is that you?
    Where is he? We need some in-depth, intelligent economic analysis, and I can't be bothered to wade through the past few months to find it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    At the root of these problems is the 'guiding hand of the state'. Greedy bankers, complex instruments, etc are just bit players and props.
    No, the state is an arm of capitalism. But we may have to agree to disagree as I need to cook tea now.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    But I don't think this will be left to the market, or we'll end up with another bubble however far down the line. I think we'll see the guiding hand of state regulation firmly on the gentle hand of the market.
    At the root of these problems is the 'guiding hand of the state'. Greedy bankers, complex instruments, etc are just bit players and props.

    Leave a comment:


  • contractor79
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Let's just get back to commonsense and try checking that people have the ability to repay before we grant mortgages. Pretty simple really, and no need for anything too dramatic.
    but that's discrimination!

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    Let's just get back to commonsense and try checking that people have the ability to repay before we grant mortgages. Pretty simple really, and no need for anything too dramatic.
    But I don't think this will be left to the market, or we'll end up with another bubble however far down the line. I think we'll see the guiding hand of state regulation firmly on the gentle hand of the market.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Old Greg View Post
    I think we may be at the end of Reaganite / Thatcherite free market laissez-faire capitalism. Not sure where we'll go next, but possibly back to post-war Keynesian economics.


    Let's just get back to commonsense and try checking that people have the ability to repay before we grant mortgages. Pretty simple really, and no need for anything too dramatic.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sockpuppet
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    No - but it is going to take a long while for the excesses to work through the system.

    New laws should be passed stopping anyone (globally) from borrowing more than three times their salary - and only 75% of the asset value.....
    income

    My salary is pittance

    Leave a comment:


  • contractor79
    replied
    something tells me it won't work and they will need to put more in

    Leave a comment:


  • Old Greg
    replied
    I think we may be at the end of Reaganite / Thatcherite free market laissez-faire capitalism. Not sure where we'll go next, but possibly back to post-war Keynesian economics.

    Leave a comment:


  • Rantor
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    yes - I did think that after my post. Though I think atw would either go for 1* salary and 50% - or all property is theft.
    Well if recent events don't qualify as a classic Crisis In Capitalism, I'm not sure what would.

    I saw newsnight a few days ago and Geofrrey Robinson joked about labour finally implementing their 1983 manifesto - that's sleeper agents for you

    Leave a comment:


  • rootsnall
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    It's not an if but a when. The bail-outs won't work, and never will, but that won't stop New Labour winning the next election and then presenting every tax payer with a £50K tax bill to cover the losses.
    Whether it works or not, top end property prices in Swindon will not be effected.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X