- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: IR35 Issues
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "IR35 Issues"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Goodmans View Postthe high court has dismissed the appeal in dragonfly consulting v commissioners of HMRC.
Leave a comment:
-
Don't worry about it. Soon nobody will be earning anything to be T'ed.
Leave a comment:
-
Sounds like ballacks to me. There are still successful ways to defend against IR35.
http://forums.contractoruk.com/gener...dragonfly.html
Leave a comment:
-
IR35 Issues
My accountant sent me this message. Anybody have any idea on this. He says HMRC is planning to put dividend under PAYE.
Matter.
In a decission that has caused alarm bells to ring right across the consultancy industry and which will be echoed similarly across that of professional tax advisers, the high court has dismissed the appeal in dragonfly consulting v commissioners of HMRC.
This decission will have a profound effect upon the success of hMRC's drive into the Issue of employment versus self employment. The taxpayer in question was doing work via his own company and via an agency company and had in place many of the safeguards that were thought to guarantee is self employed status (such as the right of substitution) and the High Court still ruled that he was an employee.
If this case remains in place as Case Law, then it is difficult to envisage many arrangements successfully passing the self employment test and this area will become a hugely profitable area of enquiry by HMRC (as if it wasnt already). Challenges to almost every scenario involving this issue can be expected goin forward and it is strongly advised that all practitioners study this case and open a dialogue with an client that they think might be at risk.
It is already common knowledge that HMRC are looking to increase the tax take by any means possible and they will not be overlooking the gift horse that this case has become.
Regards,
GoodmansTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: