- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Your day in court
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Your day in court"
Collapse
-
Wasn't the jury at Socrates trial paid? The jury basically consisted of several hundred old people with jam and moneys with raxor blades...
-
Just in case some of you haven't woken up yet, these WI lovelies should blow away a few cobwebs...
Leave a comment:
-
I reckon aardvarks would go nuts over a bit of jam. For centuries they've been sniffing around Africa existing on ants. Bit of jam would make a refreshing change. The lovely ladies of the local WI could provide the jam and a nice cup of tea brewed from old donkey knackers.Originally posted by wendigo100Or maybe something that likes jam.
Unless it's ant jam.
Leave a comment:
-
Or maybe something that likes jam.Originally posted by WageSlaveIf not, he is covered in jam and eaten alive by a pack of hungry aardvarks.
Unless it's ant jam.
Leave a comment:
-
I think we should abandon the idea of jury service as it's unfair on the hard working tax payers of this country. Instead, they should give free cider to tramps and razor blades to monkeys. The defendant is allowed to choose which side represents him and then the monkeys and tramps fight each other.
If the defendant's choice wins the fight, he walks free. If not, he is covered in jam and eaten alive by a pack of hungry aardvarks.
Leave a comment:
-
Perhaps give them all an amnesia drug at the end of the trial?Originally posted by AtWWell, I think it should be changed to make sure juros don't think about money they did not earn during process -- this is not good for justice.
Leave a comment:
-
Well, I think it should be changed to make sure juros don't think about money they did not earn during process -- this is not good for justice.Originally posted by Lucifer BoxThe blurb you get when summoned explains that it is your civic duty ("the most important thing any citizen can be required to do", it says) and that the reward of serving your Queen and country is reward enough.
Leave a comment:
-
I am happy - I was only whining about the fact that long cases make jury service unpopular and thus discredit it in some peoples' eyes (which is what the Government would very much like, as they're itching to abolish it).Originally posted by AtWstop whining and be happy that fellow citizens have control over justice system.
Leave a comment:
-
You have a point also, Alexei, in that your chances of ending up on a three year fraud case or having to deal with dangerous gangsters threatening to "sort you out afterwards" from the dock are low, but for those it happens to it is a living nightmare for which they get no reward or thanks, and from which they may never recover. The blurb you get when summoned explains that it is your civic duty ("the most important thing any citizen can be required to do", it says) and that the reward of serving your Queen and country is reward enough.Originally posted by AtWI suppose you have a point Lucifer, it is a tad suprising the law does not prevent employer from sacking you, I think this should be changed -- and lost earnings should be returned in form of tax credit for that amount.
Leave a comment:
-
I suppose you have a point Lucifer, it is a tad suprising the law does not prevent employer from sacking you, I think this should be changed -- and lost earnings should be returned in form of tax credit for that amount.
Leave a comment:
-
I thought you just ate the judge?Originally posted by zeitghostYou can always plead insanity to escape jury duty.
It's what I do.
Worked every time so far...
Leave a comment:
-
That's all fine and well as long as you don't end up on a three year fraud case (e.g. Guinness) and end up losing your job and all prospect of future employment, or on a dangerous gangster trial and end up having to flee the country and change your identity. I remember a documentary a few years ago called "Jury Service Destroyed My Life" or somesuch that was full of such examples.Originally posted by AtWWell, as a juror you will be able to have your say over this, right? I mean its you who will say the guy is guilty or not.
And also I don't buy your notion of extremely long cases -- even major national scale stuff takes weeks, not years. I don't know the frequency of juror's callup, but if it costs to you few weeks every few years then its not a problem, so stop whining and be happy that fellow citizens have control over justice system.
Remember, Alexei, your employer is not obliged to pay you while you do jury service or even keep your job open for you - they are quite entitled to sack you. If your employer refuses to pay you, you can claim a daily allowance of about £20 from the state. If you are self-employed or are otherwise a one man band, you could go bankrupt (and that is not one of the excuses you can use unfortunately).
Leave a comment:
-
CPS, truly scary trolls. I had a lot of dealings with them when I worked at the Home Office. Ugliest and most stupid people outside of Wales.Originally posted by OwlHootThe Crown Prosecution Service is an example in miniature of what happens when civil servants make decisions whether to prosecute - Before Edward Heath set it up in the 1970s, the UK had Grand Juries (as they still do in the US) to decide whether there was a case to answer. Only if the Grand Jury returned a true bill [of indictment] would a case come to court before a petty jury (i.e. the kind of jury we still have today).
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers

Leave a comment: