• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oh dear : FSA bans short-selling"

Collapse

  • Dow Jones
    replied
    The long and short of it

    TS, you may or may not know that long- and short-selling are both sides of the same coin. Unfortunately, the latter is much more lucrative, especially if engineered rumours start to prevail.
    The HBOS downfall was caused by both shorting and unusual heavy selling by a no of institutions (most of which chose to operate via the same counterparty-often disguised-that was used for the shorting).
    In my opinion and some of our traders I have spoken to, the HBOS shares should have been suspended - pending an enquiry whilst banning the practice - and - in order to prevent a potential run on savings that may have ensued - for the Gov't to intervene and buy a chunk of shares with a view of selling back when the markets have been steadied.
    As SG said, the FSA once gain has proved to be a joke.

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Let the fooking market decide who's efficient and who's not.
    I don't think you even know what "efficient market" is - hint: it's not when you make shredload of money, this has nothing to do with efficiency.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Efficie...ket_hypothesis

    "In finance, the efficient-market hypothesis (EMH) asserts that financial markets are "informationally efficient", or that prices on traded assets, e.g., stocks, bonds, or property, already reflect all known information."

    People who short are trying to manipulate the market - it's an artificial attempt to make money from nothing at the expense of long term investors.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by Andy2 View Post
    So in the absence of shorting is it correct to assume that financial shares will move only one way - UP

    BOOMED
    they have not banned selling a long position with a loss yet, have they?

    Leave a comment:


  • Andy2
    replied
    So in the absence of shorting is it correct to assume that financial shares will move only one way - UP

    BOOMED

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    Let the fooking market decide who's efficient and who's not.
    atw can fook off back to Russia and build his utopian state.
    Oh hang on, it's been tried already

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Questions are being asked. FT: Alphaville: 'HBOS: Where are the shorts'.

    It's going to bite the snot goblin in the

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    There are potential abuses available in all forms of transaction. Should there be a ban on buying too, because ‘speculants’ could sell at a higher price and get a profit that way?
    Gordon will decide what your company is worth.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    It will not put anyone off opening a long position as the way to close that position, as AtW rightly points out, is called ‘Selling’. It will harm the City in many ways; not least of all is the prospect of more, almost random and with short or no notice, introduction of regulation and restrictions.

    There are potential abuses available in all forms of transaction. Should there be a ban on buying too, because ‘speculants’ could sell at a higher price and get a profit that way?

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by GreenerGrass View Post
    I'm disappointed, I was 99% certain the first thread I would see this morning would be titled "BOOMED! Markets that can only ever go up!" by DimPrawn.
    Boom Is Doomed I'm afraid

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • GreenerGrass
    replied
    I'm disappointed, I was 99% certain the first thread I would see this morning would be titled "BOOMED! Markets that can only ever go up!" by DimPrawn.

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    If this stays in place will it not have the opposite effect to that intended?
    ie. many investors will not buy the stock as they are restricted in covering their position by shorting? And secondly will it further spook UK markets due to fear of further government intervention by Mr. G."lets sell our Gold at $250" Brown?

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    He's a city fan, men in wheelchairs is their division


    Here is my brilliant solution to all Man City bitter dejected fans problems - close the shop and support the real team in the City - ManU. No shame in joining the winning team - you'd be happy as it would win, obvious solution to all problems. This would save a lot of wheelchair users from being punched too

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    He's a city fan, men in wheelchairs is their division

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Originally posted by Alf W View Post
    I'm not going to argue with you AtW over this, as it would feel like a bit like punching a man in a wheelchair.
    How do you know how it feels? Sounds like you punched someone

    Leave a comment:


  • Alf W
    replied
    I'm not going to argue with you AtW over this, as it would feel like a bit like punching a man in a wheelchair.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X