• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Hard Work or Luck

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Hard Work or Luck"

Collapse

  • wantacontract
    replied
    35% hard work and 75% luck.....yes, I needed lots of luck...

    Luck is better then hard work.

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    dMoney
    ------- = fn (Working Smart)
    dt

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by shoes View Post
    It's genetics and upbringing.

    It could be argued that lazy people are lazy because they have a genetic predisposition to be lazy and so technically it is not their fault.

    Is that so? I'm very lazy yet I've done OK for myself. Why do so many people on this site think they are a cut above the rest?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by DimPrawn View Post
    Why bother with ambition when the benefits system pays for everything?
    You joke, but the height of ambition for many is to get the most out of the benefits system.

    Aspiration, ambition neatly dumbed down courtesy of socialism.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Originally posted by DodgyAgent View Post
    It is neither it is simply ambition.
    Why bother with ambition when the benefits system pays for everything?

    Leave a comment:


  • DodgyAgent
    replied
    Originally posted by Peoplesoft bloke View Post
    Form the Harriet Harpy thread. Do you think it's luck or hard work that makes you sucessful?

    I reckon I was lucky to be born with a modicum of brains and talent - but I have put myself out and done stuff that (for example) my considerably brainier best mate wouldn't dream of doing - hence I earn more than him.

    It is neither it is simply ambition.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by aussielong View Post
    there is no luck, even the little crafty eye you gave the secretary of your uni when you enrolled has rubbed off on the universe and propelled you to where you are today
    dumped

    Leave a comment:


  • aussielong
    replied
    luck bollocks

    there is no luck, even the little crafty eye you gave the secretary of your uni when you enrolled has rubbed off on the universe and propelled you to where you are today

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by Gordon Brown View Post
    I like to think it's not down to luck or hard work, but maybe due to the most prudent and effective Chancellor in living memory.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ivor Bigun
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    I say luck does not come into it although having a talent for something (and realising it) could be regarded as lucky I suppose.
    Each job is different and hard in one way or another.
    You do not get to the top of your tree, or even close to it, by being lucky. Even the worst chief exec has worked their way to the top.
    You are successful because you work hard. You have studied and practised whatever you do to such an extent that you can earn lots (comparative) of money and can enjoy the benefits that brings.
    There is a certain amount of luck in being in the right place at the right time, but without the hard work there would be no opportunity or ability to take advantage. Even with no luck the hard work would still pay off.

    The IT industry is not the best payer either so no luck there and as expat said, a lot of what we do is easy so with a little hard work anyone could do it. It is not like we are gifted at anything is it.

    Damm right - IMO, Luck is where opportunity meets preparation.

    Unfortunately, its easy to misdiagnose what the preparation is.
    IMO, its a mistake is to think it's personal skill or intelligence.
    Its about capitalising on being in the right place at the right time.

    Leave a comment:


  • Gordon Brown
    replied
    I like to think it's not down to luck or hard work, but maybe due to the most prudent and effective Chancellor in living memory.

    Leave a comment:


  • elmo
    replied
    Its not how hard a job is that deternmines the $$$'s the biggest things are decision making and expertise. Are the decisions big, expensive etc then you will get paid lots or do you have expertise in something whether that be IT, like most on here, plumber, joiner, doctor etc etc.

    Its the 2 big determinations of cash, but obviously hard work/luck will effect how much you get in comparison to your peers doing similar roles.

    Leave a comment:


  • Peoplesoft bloke
    replied
    Originally posted by Spacecadet View Post
    even so, chief exec where? In some companies the role can be a definite gravy train but there are probably a lot more where the chief exec is under serious pressure from the board to get results, increase/make profits and have to do the tulip job of reducing head count
    Reducing head count is dead easy - the lazy management way to increase profits. As for pressure - sure, but unlike the tulip jobs you still get a fat wedge for a few years even if you're crap. CE = piece of piss

    Leave a comment:


  • Shimano105
    replied
    Originally posted by Torran View Post
    I got to this point with a bit of common sense, a bit of luck and a pair of balls.
    Lance Armstrong got where he is with less than that

    Leave a comment:


  • Shimano105
    replied
    Originally posted by Iron Condor View Post
    Being a risk taker is probably more important than being lucky. Taking calculated risks is how you make your own luck.
    Like jacking in a permie role in a recession and diving back into the contract market? Woohoo - I'm making my own luck!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X