• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK to rethink how it staffs projects"

Collapse

  • foritisme
    replied
    True - but you have to convince the HR nobs who work for most of these clients.

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    You're not temporary workers... you're employed by our own Ltd.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cooperinliverp00l
    replied
    Originally posted by P1mpAndPr0ud View Post
    That's kind of my point - surely opting out of current regulations defines you as a provider of services, rather than a temporary employee (thus new regs are not relevant)?
    Does this really effect us as contractors......i don't want the pay cut to be on equal rights..

    Leave a comment:


  • P1mpAndPr0ud
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Oh it's very relevant. Let's hope we get another opt out clause for this too or it'll be 11 week contracts all round.
    That's kind of my point - surely opting out of current regulations defines you as a provider of services, rather than a temporary employee (thus new regs are not relevant)?

    Leave a comment:


  • Spacecadet
    replied
    Originally posted by P1mpAndPr0ud View Post
    Posted on CUK today...

    [I]Demand for temporary workers who use recruitment agencies is set to plummet if a European directive to give them the same pay as permanent staff is introduced.
    WTF!!! no way i'm taking a pay cut cause of some knob in brussells

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by P1mpAndPr0ud View Post
    Posted on CUK today...

    Demand for temporary workers who use recruitment agencies is set to plummet if a European directive to give them the same pay as permanent staff is introduced.
    ..............
    Questioned by law firm Eversheds, the overwhelming majority of employers said the new rules would “force them to change the way they structure their workforce”.


    Is it just me, or is this not relevant to the majority of contractors? Most I know - and, it seems, most posters on here - don't WANT the same rights (and thus responsibilities) as perm staff. And besides, many run their own company, and as such provide a service, etc...

    Am I missing the point?

    Oh it's very relevant. Let's hope we get another opt out clause for this too or it'll be 11 week contracts all round.

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by P1mpAndPr0ud View Post
    Posted on CUK today...

    Demand for temporary workers who use recruitment agencies is set to plummet if a European directive to give them the same pay as permanent staff is introduced.

    Almost two-thirds of employers believe they will reduce their reliance on agency workers should they be legally entitled to equal pay and conditions after 12 weeks.

    Exactly how equality of employment rights, including holiday pay, will work for temps and employers alike is likely to remain unclear until 2009, at the earliest.

    The directive may not affect the UK until 2010 but employers are already worried about how it might develop, and are sure it will dramatically change their hiring practices.

    Questioned by law firm Eversheds, the overwhelming majority of employers said the new rules would “force them to change the way they structure their workforce”.



    Is it just me, or is this not relevant to the majority of contractors? Most I know - and, it seems, most posters on here - don't WANT the same rights (and thus responsibilities) as perm staff. And besides, many run their own company, and as such provide a service, etc...

    Am I missing the point?

    Yes.


    this has been discussed previously

    Leave a comment:


  • P1mpAndPr0ud
    started a topic UK to rethink how it staffs projects

    UK to rethink how it staffs projects

    Posted on CUK today...

    Demand for temporary workers who use recruitment agencies is set to plummet if a European directive to give them the same pay as permanent staff is introduced.

    Almost two-thirds of employers believe they will reduce their reliance on agency workers should they be legally entitled to equal pay and conditions after 12 weeks.

    Exactly how equality of employment rights, including holiday pay, will work for temps and employers alike is likely to remain unclear until 2009, at the earliest.

    The directive may not affect the UK until 2010 but employers are already worried about how it might develop, and are sure it will dramatically change their hiring practices.

    Questioned by law firm Eversheds, the overwhelming majority of employers said the new rules would “force them to change the way they structure their workforce”.



    Is it just me, or is this not relevant to the majority of contractors? Most I know - and, it seems, most posters on here - don't WANT the same rights (and thus responsibilities) as perm staff. And besides, many run their own company, and as such provide a service, etc...

    Am I missing the point?

Working...
X