I can see one big flaw in the Government's scheme to keep children in education until they are 17.
Who the **** is going to look after their kids whilst they are at school?
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Latest government ploy to reduce the unemployment figures"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Incognito View PostUnfortunately that isn't the answer, because all these bleeding heart liberals wouldn't allow the chavs to be beasted which is just what they need.
Not just the chavs but all of em (or should that say "us" ?)
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by dinker View PostOne of my neighbours is a bricklayer, the education system was a waste of time as far as he was concerned.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bren586 View PostThey will try and get 95% of those in the "ability" group that does not do A-levels to be able to read and write instead.
As for it not being broke!
What point is there releasing a 16 year old who has either failed the education system or been failed by it into the job market ?
Leave a comment:
-
Basically no as they are only required to do 1 days taining/studying a week.
So what's the point?
Leave a comment:
-
Surely 16-18 year olds haven't been counted as unemployed for a long time now. Tory policy IIRC.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by eliquant View Post
Does this means that having A-Levels won't be a minority thing any more ?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7595155.stm
As for it not being broke!
What point is there releasing a 16 year old who has either failed the education system or been failed by it into the job market ?Last edited by bren586; 3 September 2008, 07:20.
Leave a comment:
-
Latest government ploy to reduce the unemployment figures
The minimum leaving age is now 17 and proposed to be set to 18 in the future..
Does this means that having A-Levels won't be a minority thing any more ?
Some people are just not academic and would rather stay out of the education system... I just think if it aint broke .. don't fix it...
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7595155.stmTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Today 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Leave a comment: