• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Crash in house prices"

Collapse

  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    So prices virtually static from 94 to 98 is "picking up very quickly" is it?

    On the basis of the "90" slump, we have 4 years of falling prices and 4 further years of static prices.

    We would appear to be at the same point in the graph as at 1990. From there prices next went over the "red" line in 2002.

    I really can't see this slump being very different, BICBW.

    tim
    Read the chart: overall, about 2.4% per annum. Crap compared to a decent bank account, but lovely for some short-term time periods, less so for others.

    Did you ever buy to cash-in? I never have - too risky. Proper spreading of your investments for the longer term will, almost certainly, avoid "Oh F--k!" surprises like house price falls. I salute those who made a killing, but could never take the risk myself - I'm too cowardly.

    Leave a comment:


  • scooterscot
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    They are having problems shifting this one.



    Knock 12.5% off - still no takers.
    Is it really worth that when I can get this 10 minutes walking distance away?

    Seems like a good price too -

    Leave a comment:


  • VectraMan
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    The chart shows that property prices are not always one-way in the short-term, but in the long-term they are definitely one-way, and that is UP !!!
    Yep. But that only helps you if you buy at or below the long term trend (i.e. the red line). Even if we had a long slow return to the red line rather than a crash, you'd still not likely beat inflation. So anybody who owns anything now can only lose. Boomed!

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by tim123 View Post
    So prices virtually static from 94 to 98 is "picking up very quickly" is it?

    On the basis of the "90" slump, we have 4 years of falling prices and 4 further years of static prices.

    We would appear to be at the same point in the graph as at 1990. From there prices next went over the "red" line in 2002.

    I really can't see this slump being very different, BICBW.

    tim


    The chart shows that property prices are not always one-way in the short-term, but in the long-term they are definitely one-way, and that is UP !!!

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    That graph's very interesting. Even when the poo hit the fan, things picked up pretty quickly, and overall trend is up, up, up!
    .
    So prices virtually static from 94 to 98 is "picking up very quickly" is it?

    On the basis of the "90" slump, we have 4 years of falling prices and 4 further years of static prices.

    We would appear to be at the same point in the graph as at 1990. From there prices next went over the "red" line in 2002.

    I really can't see this slump being very different, BICBW.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    £3.5M and yet overlooked by the neighbours!

    Leave a comment:


  • Francko
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    They are having problems shifting this one.



    Knock 12.5% off - still no takers.
    It could have costed 100000. If only it was in Swindon.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    That graph's very interesting. Even when the poo hit the fan, things picked up pretty quickly, and overall trend is up, up, up!

    A lot of the current Doomed pap in the papers, etc., is just tired and emotional journos going for the easy Doomed story.

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    They are having problems shifting this one.

    Reduced from £4,000,000 for a quick sale.
    Knock 12.5% off - still no takers.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    based on this it looks like it will bottom out at just under 100K. Just a few months to wait.

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenophon
    replied
    Yay!

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    started a topic Crash in house prices

    Crash in house prices

    http://www.housepricecrash.co.uk/gra...d/homepage.png

    Not what I'd call the end of the world is it?

    Boomed!

Working...
X