• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Coastal erosion 'may not be stopped'"

Collapse

  • Moose423956
    replied
    Originally posted by Flubster View Post
    I live 3 miles from the sea. 100 years ago this spot was 3 miles from the sea. A 100,000 years ago it was under the sea. 200,000 years ago, it was under ice and 1,000,000 years ago it was a desert.

    Not trying to disprove global warming, but plate tectonics plays a huge part in this...
    Not wishing to poo poo your argument, but plate tectonics does take slightly longer to have an effect than rising (or falling) sea levels.

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Dalek View Post
    If it were any part of London, there'd be appeals, emergency taxing, media frenzy, etc. And there's the clue... the biggest threat to London is a big surge down the North Sea, washing up the Thames, and causing devastation. So, what should be done: (a) Build defences to ameleorate such a surge (N.B. this option is expensive and requires planning and intelligence), or (b) Allow the east coast (north of London) to erode, thus widening the surge path, and so taking a fair whack of energy out of it, as well as creating (as a side effect) salt marshes which act as sponges, with the small, piffling cost of displaced folk who don't live in London? Go on, have a guess.
    (c) Close and weld shut the tidal barriers, and help turn London into a wetland area. Cost: £1.50

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    If it were any part of London, there'd be appeals, emergency taxing, media frenzy, etc. And there's the clue... the biggest threat to London is a big surge down the North Sea, washing up the Thames, and causing devastation. So, what should be done: (a) Build defences to ameleorate such a surge (N.B. this option is expensive and requires planning and intelligence), or (b) Allow the east coast (north of London) to erode, thus widening the surge path, and so taking a fair whack of energy out of it, as well as creating (as a side effect) salt marshes which act as sponges, with the small, piffling cost of displaced folk who don't live in London? Go on, have a guess.

    Leave a comment:


  • Flubster
    replied
    I live 3 miles from the sea. 100 years ago this spot was 3 miles from the sea. A 100,000 years ago it was under the sea. 200,000 years ago, it was under ice and 1,000,000 years ago it was a desert.

    Not trying to disprove global warming, but plate tectonics plays a huge part in this...

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Have you not seen Al Gore's movie "an inconveniant truth"?
    The whole World will be flooded like in "the day after tommorow".
    All countries will become tropical palm fringed islands.
    Holland will be 100 metres under-water.
    thank the lord we are doing so well in the rowing and sailing. At least the Brits will survive. The Dutch can grow webbed feet and gills






    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by Paddy View Post
    The sediment drifts over to Holland. Holland will be 300 miles wide.
    Have you not seen Al Gore's movie "an inconveniant truth"?
    The whole World will be flooded like in "the day after tommorow".
    All countries will become tropical palm fringed islands.
    Holland will be 100 metres under-water.

    Leave a comment:


  • Paddy
    replied
    Originally posted by foritisme View Post
    So will England only be about 10 miles wide in 100 years

    The sediment drifts over to Holland. Holland will be 300 miles wide.

    Leave a comment:


  • foritisme
    replied
    So will England only be about 10 miles wide in 100 years

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    "Parts of north-east Norfolk and Suffolk are most immediately at risk, he said."

    Where abouts are these places? If they disappear what difference does it make?

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    started a topic Coastal erosion 'may not be stopped'

    Coastal erosion 'may not be stopped'

    People living on Britain's vanishing coastlines have been told there is nothing they can do to stop their homes from being lost to the sea.

    The new head of the Environment Agency says coastal erosion means stretches of land are doomed - and evacuation plans should be drawn up.
    Linky


    Anybody here got beach side property?

Working...
X