• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "The unacceptable face of capitalism"

Collapse

  • Rebecca Loos
    replied
    interesting man. Why was he called 'tiny'?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Miserable old man
    The idea of unions is a good one, the way they operate in practice is something else! It's rather ironic that in the US the teamsters were mafiosi maskerading as a union.
    Do learn to spell, old boy!

    Leave a comment:


  • Miserable old man
    replied
    The idea of unions is a good one, the way they operate in practice is something else! It's rather ironic that in the US the teamsters were mafiosi maskerading as a union.

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    As my family are of mining stock in Ashington and my father was a Bus driver and Trade Union Secretary I was raised with Socialist values.

    As I grew up I realised that the world dint work like that and I would have to make my own way.

    Now as a freelance consultant I am more inclined towards capitalism.

    What I have problems with is this Govt. stating it wants a global free market economy whenever it is supporting its business sponsors yet constantly clipping the wings of the consumer with legislation to force us to source everything from within the UK or EU.
    I have no problem with manufacturers taking jobs and manufacturing abroad as long as the price of goods is reflected at the checkout or I can source my goods and services from any global source I choose.

    Third world goods at third world prices.

    Leave a comment:


  • BobTheCrate
    started a topic The unacceptable face of capitalism

    The unacceptable face of capitalism

    How many of you would describe yourselves as natural Tory voters ?

    I'd describe myself as a natural Tory voter. In my younger more 'feet first' years I was very quick to rubbish the socialists and the trade unions. And I still think to this day Maggie did the country a huge service in clipping the wings of trade unions that had become way too powerful and dictatorial. This is not the focus of my point though.

    Now, a good bit older, in the last few years and under this particular Labour Gov't, I'm starting to understand more vividly why trade unions came to be. I detect (me, a Tory voter !) corporations seeking ways to fabricate situations whereby they can 'sack' employees inorder to replace them with the cheapest labour they can find in the world.

    Whether this is acceptable or not is one debate. Although a clue to that is the sincerity (or lack of it) behind the sackings. But this is happening under a Labour Gov't and with its silent blessing, not a Tory one.

    On the other side of the political spectrum, Ted Heath was remembered for referring to some corporation (can't remember which though and for what reason) as representing "the unacceptable face of capitalism".

Working...
X