• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Minister wants supertax on Britain’s top earners"

Collapse

  • Sysman
    replied
    Originally posted by zeitghost
    The Legends of the Giant Alien Lizards tell of a time under Harald the Wilson when one type of income tax reached a notional 102%...

    And people used to rent their suits as a tax avoidance measure.
    I can remember working on payroll and discovering that senior management weren't on terrific salaries, presumably taking the rest in perks. It put an artificial ceiling on what the rest of us could earn.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/mon...cle4547848.ece

    With defeat looming New Liebor is shedding it's skin. Apparently they want this tax on the rich to help the middle classes. But aren't the middle classes the ones that this lot have been milking for the last 11 yrs, to pay for their crazy social experiments?

    Lewis points to families who take two holidays a year, belong to private gyms and eat in restaurants, but struggle to pay soaring bills, as the group in need of help.

    “If, as a result of the current economic situation, the only way to help hard-pressed middle-class families is to ask the highest earners to pay more, then serious consideration should be given to that,” he writes.




    Tax would of course be higher under the Tories !!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    As a Child!!!!!

    It's like a bleedin Kindergarten on here
    Hahaha, it's nice to feel the shoe is on the other foot, most of the forums I lurk on I'm the old git of the bunch.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by TykeMerc View Post
    With the European Union rules on free cross boarder travel and trade that could prove to be quite a challenge.

    I remember hearing about the 98 tax rates too as a child.
    As a Child!!!!!

    It's like a bleedin Kindergarten on here

    Leave a comment:


  • TykeMerc
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    Yes but that time they forgot to put exit taxes in place, to protect the government's revenue stream
    With the European Union rules on free cross boarder travel and trade that could prove to be quite a challenge.

    I remember hearing about the 98 tax rates too as a child.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Dalek
    replied
    Wasn't this sort of mindless rubbish tried, tested, and shown to be crap, by ... er... Labour in the dark and neolithic 70s?

    The super rich will just toddle off to Switzerland/wherever and pop back home for Xmas, etc.

    It's the political equivalent of a desperate prayer.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by chris79 View Post
    Yeah all that will happen is the super rich just move abroad.. I'm sure I heard my dad tell me this happened before the 70s or something?? When tax was 98%, might just be a fairy tale but sure there's some similar story which was reality.
    Yes but that time they forgot to put exit taxes in place, to protect the government's revenue stream

    Leave a comment:


  • chris79
    replied
    Yeah all that will happen is the super rich just move abroad.. I'm sure I heard my dad tell me this happened before the 70s or something?? When tax was 98%, might just be a fairy tale but sure there's some similar story which was reality.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    What happened to labor's pledge of a classless society?

    Tax the upper class to help the middle class to help the upper class to screw the working class to help cover the reduced income of the upper class confused.con

    Time that Brown and his cronies got the boot methinks
    NL is still working on a classless society...if this new tax goes ahead then all those upper class knobs will leave the country...keep this up long enough and you will only have one class of person in this country, the lower classes (cause they cant afford to flee like everyone else! ).

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    but Liebour CAN help here...

    You seen that program about dodgy restaurants. These middle class restaurant eating types need protecting! I think Darlings got an idea for this:

    More taxes on eating out. That should help these poor souls, just like we're helping those feral kids, binge drinkers, and middle class wine sozzelers by increasing alcohol tax.

    Hmme....how can we help all those poor motorists stuck in traffic jams...

    Leave a comment:


  • SizeZero
    replied
    Originally posted by thunderlizard View Post
    What the heck? When did private gym membership, 2 holidays a year and eating in restaurants become a basic human right?
    Since the middle classes had to let their chefs go, forcing them to eat in restaurants, learn to cook (heavens forbid) or starve. I believe some contractors here had to lay their domestic staff off recently....

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Interesting that governments with lower tax bands raise more in taxes. But Liebour never lets facts confuse their thinking.

    Leave a comment:


  • thunderlizard
    replied
    What the heck? When did private gym membership, 2 holidays a year and eating in restaurants become a basic human right?

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    This is an excellent idea.


    It should start at 75% of all income above 1 standard deviation from average earnings and 98% at 2 standard deviations.


    If the Darling/Brown would hold an emergency budget and introduce that measure we would all be better off.......






    ...... because the government would fall within the week.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/mon...cle4547848.ece

    With defeat looming New Liebor is shedding it's skin. Apparently they want this tax on the rich to help the middle classes. But aren't the middle classes the ones that this lot have been milking for the last 11 yrs, to pay for their crazy social experiments?

    Lewis points to families who take two holidays a year, belong to private gyms and eat in restaurants, but struggle to pay soaring bills, as the group in need of help.

    “If, as a result of the current economic situation, the only way to help hard-pressed middle-class families is to ask the highest earners to pay more, then serious consideration should be given to that,” he writes.


    What happened to labor's pledge of a classless society?

    Tax the upper class to help the middle class to help the upper class to screw the working class to help cover the reduced income of the upper class confused.con

    Time that Brown and his cronies got the boot methinks

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X