- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Merrill Lynch Contracts
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Merrill Lynch Contracts"
Collapse
-
A mate of mine works for them and was worried about his renewal when he saw this. Apparently his department is exempt from this crackdown and they've agreed to renew. Don't think he is getting his 11% back that they cut a while back though...
-
Western companies have always known the risk of doing business in Russia.
They have rushed to invest because the returns are so high. It seems even after BP and South Ossetia they are still keen to invest (no link, but I read it somewhere )
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by DodgyAgent View PostBut Western companies have rushed to throw money at Russia, both in direct and indirect investment. The push by City bankers into Moscow and St Petersburg is matched only by the flood of billionaire oligarchs taking money out. There’s perhaps a lesson there. I’d back the oligarchs to make the shrewder investment call.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by thunderlizard View PostIt doesn't look wholly bad either. They're operating within a closed shop, for now.
Does NOT look good at all.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by backlight View PostDoes not look good for people on existing contracts at Merrill.
Leave a comment:
-
Merrills dont seem to be doing much right. A quote from the Times that applies to Russian Investment in general:
But Western companies have rushed to throw money at Russia, both in direct and indirect investment. The push by City bankers into Moscow and St Petersburg is matched only by the flood of billionaire oligarchs taking money out. There’s perhaps a lesson there. I’d back the oligarchs to make the shrewder investment call.
The passion for Russia shows no sign of abating. Last week Merrill Lynch polled 200 fund managers responsible for $600 billion. Their favourite emerging market was Russia, ahead even of fashionable economies such as Thailand, Turkey and Brazil. Mark Mobius, the emerging markets guru at Templeton, went so far as to say yesterday that the Georgian invasion was “a minor event” and was Georgia’s fault anyway. He is as keen on Russian stocks as ever.
When the fighting in South Ossetia was at its height last week, one City analyst was raving about Russia’s spectacular growth. Had I seen the latest car sales figures? Sales were up 41 per cent, making it the biggest consumer of cars in Europe, ahead of Germany.
These are astonishing figures, it is true. And Russia’s tremendous reserves of gas and other commodities make it difficult to ignore. Companies can’t afford to be too fastidious about their business partners. But the idea that Russia can be seen as just another economy, and its businesses assessed purely in terms of dry p/e ratios, is folly.
There’s an echo of Robert Maxwell in the 1980s. Everyone agreed he was a monster, everyone heard rumours of his crookedness. And everyone, from Goldman Sachs downwards, was desperate to do business with him. Mr Maxwell had no scruples about betraying his shareholders and stealing from his pensioners. Western investors are mistaken if they think that Vladimir Putin would hesitate to expropriate their assets if it suited him.
I am feeling very smug as my business is not aligned to either retail or finance
Leave a comment:
-
Merrill Lynch Contracts
Does not look good for people on existing contracts at Merrill.
http://news.hereisthecity.com/news/b...ews/8137.cntns
"No on-boarding of contingent workers will be permitted for the remainder of the year. This includes all temporary help, contract workers and independent contractors. Renewals of existing agreements are also not allowed."Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: