• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Racist or simply stating the facts?"

Collapse

  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    One crime for 'illegal immigration' = first sentence

    One crime for 'mugging' etc = second sentence

    As long as the immigrant is sentenced for TWO crimes committed then it is not racist.
    Saves on paperwork I suppose

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post

    One crime for 'illegal immigration' = first sentence

    One crime for 'mugging' etc = second sentence

    As long as the immigrant is sentenced for TWO crimes committed then it is not racist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    If they give them an additional sentence for being illegal immigrants then of course that is not racist, but the text said that they were going to give longer sentences for the same crime. There is a subtle difference.


    illegal immigrants convicted of crimes will now face jail sentences a third longer than those for Italians.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by Diver View Post
    Er! the Italians aren't illegal immigrants in Italy

    That would be the foreigners (Illegal immigrants) That are being discriminated against because they are being punished for being illegal immigrants as well, see

    I don't suppose that it would sit well with Italians if Italians were prosecuted for being illegal immigrants in Italy in an Italian court


    If they give them an additional sentence for being illegal immigrants then of course that is not racist, but the text said that they were going to give longer sentences for the same crime. There is a subtle difference.

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    It is racist to give one sector of society longer sentences than others for the same crime.
    I suppose Italy can get away with it because they do not have our stupid Human Rights laws which were incorporated into our law by New Lie, that go too far the other way.
    Er! the Italians aren't illegal immigrants in Italy

    That would be the foreigners (Illegal immigrants) That are being discriminated against because they are being punished for being illegal immigrants as well, see

    I don't suppose that it would sit well with Italians if Italians were prosecuted for being illegal immigrants in Italy in an Italian court

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    It is racist to give one sector of society longer sentences than others for the same crime.
    I suppose Italy can get away with it because they do not have our stupid Human Rights laws which were incorporated into our law by New Lie, that go too far the other way.

    Leave a comment:


  • SizeZero
    replied
    It states that the extra punishment is for 'illegal immigrants'. That's totally justified because they have committed two crimes: the one for which they are tried, and the fact that they are an illegal immigrant.

    Anyway, the story of the girl called 'Talula does the Hula from Hawaii' is far more interesting...
    http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/asia-pacific/7522952.stm
    Last edited by SizeZero; 24 July 2008, 10:02.

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Only racist if they claim something against another race than southern europeans.

    Leave a comment:


  • Incognito
    replied
    Originally posted by ace00 View Post
    Seems like a reasonable response to an established problem. Though I wonder how they define "foreigner".
    Anyone christened Johnny

    Leave a comment:


  • ace00
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Seems like a reasonable response to an established problem. Though I wonder how they define "foreigner".

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    The figures are not racist but they do prove one thing. The locals are more inclined to try to kill you than to nick your wallet.






    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Did you know that 73% of people think statistics are complete bollocks?
    Did you know that the other 73% are Statisticians









    Think about it

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Xenophon View Post
    Compelling stats.
    Did you know that 73% of people think statistics are complete bollocks?

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Incognito View Post
    Is that cause the Mafia own all the judges and cops so don't get prosecuted?

    Leave a comment:


  • Xenophon
    replied
    Compelling stats.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X