• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Oh Dear: can't think of a title"

Collapse

  • WageSlave
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill
    Churchill in "off to lick his bollox" mode.
    Now if that's not the biggest clue...

    Wage in 'Spod' mode

    Leave a comment:


  • Not So Wise
    replied
    Same as most US news agencys had no problem interviewing IRA terrorists, hell even the american people had no problem with it. They were the biggest funders of the IRA.

    Or multiple other terrorist groups (normally calling themselves freedom fighters) from around the world

    Reminds me of a documentary that an arab girl made about the war, she basiclly filmed Al Jazeera news rooms and how they operated for the whole war.

    When it was released she was interviewed and asked, "did you have no problem with Al Jazeera's partiality towards Arab's"?

    Her reply was "no more than i had a problem with ABC,Fox's or CNN's towards the USA"

    Who if you did not know had no reporters in Iraq except with US troops and only reported what the US autoritys said they could while many others from other countrys (including UK) had loads of reporters in bagdad.

    Al Jazeera's is the arab worlds CNN/BBC (closer to BBC actually as they have no problem going against goverments) giving them news tailored for them, only reason we in the west have a problem with it is because their news is tailored for those we consider "the enemy"..aka the whole arab world
    Last edited by Not So Wise; 4 August 2005, 14:55.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucifer Box


    Of course, everything is relative.
    It'd be a bigger number in hexadecimal...

    Hmm, so I believe, being a dog and all that I wouldn't really know...

    Churchill in "off to lick his bollox" mode.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucifer Box
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill
    Would that be base ten, then?


    Of course, everything is relative.

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    Originally posted by Not So Wise
    Why? They are no more a "mouth peice" for the Arab world than most westeren news agencys are for the west

    And hell if ABC can do interviews with the guy behind Beslan why can Al Jazeera not do it with Arab terrorists?
    Lets see...you point to only one example of an interview with a terrorist being aired by a western news source YET see no problem with al jism that has supported terrorism for a number of years.

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by OwlHoot
    It would almost be worth learning arabic for the fun you could have winding them up - like Chico^10
    Would that be base ten, then?

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru
    Anyone know of a Jihadi forum that lets you post stuff?
    It would almost be worth learning arabic for the fun you could have winding them up - like Chico^10

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Not So Wise
    Why? They are no more a "mouth peice" for the Arab world than most westeren news agencys are for the west

    And hell if ABC can do interviews with the guy behind Beslan why can Al Jazeera not do it with Arab terrorists?
    Oh, so they're merely supporting Democracy in their output then...

    hmmm, silly me.

    Leave a comment:


  • sasguru
    replied
    From a Londoner

    Bin Laden's no. 2? He must be a relatively small turd then. Oh sorry, you said no jokes.

    Anyone know of a Jihadi forum that lets you post stuff?
    Last edited by sasguru; 4 August 2005, 13:05.

    Leave a comment:


  • Not So Wise
    replied
    Why? They are no more a "mouth peice" for the Arab world than most westeren news agencys are for the west

    And hell if ABC can do interviews with the guy behind Beslan why can Al Jazeera not do it with Arab terrorists?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by John Galt
    From Sky News

    Breaking news - threats of more terrorist attacks on the UK from Bin Laden's number 2 (no silly jokes please chaps)
    Isn't it about time that Al Jazeera was shut down?

    Leave a comment:


  • John Galt
    started a topic Oh Dear: can't think of a title

    Oh Dear: can't think of a title

    From Sky News

    Breaking news - threats of more terrorist attacks on the UK from Bin Laden's number 2 (no silly jokes please chaps)

Working...
X