• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Panorama tonight

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Panorama tonight"

Collapse

  • Troll
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/society...l-we-learn.htm

    Troll, I take it you aren't Gerald Warner?
    Nor am I Kipling & apologies for missing off the quotes

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Hmm, so I missed this last night but wasn't too concerned as I thought I would catch it on the web via the BBC iPlayer service.

    However, they do not seem to be offering this programme as part of that...

    Leave a comment:


  • mrdonuts
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Should have just nuked the bastards in the first place.
    imo its not to late!

    Leave a comment:


  • snaw
    replied
    Originally posted by Clippy View Post
    Nah, just a plagiarist.
    Kind of like pretending to be someone you're not, only with words ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Clippy
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post
    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/society...l-we-learn.htm

    Troll, I take it you aren't Gerald Warner?
    Nah, just a plagiarist.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by Troll View Post
    When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains
    And the women come out to cut up what remains
    Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
    An’ go to your Gawd like a soldier.


    British troops in Helmand: What are they doing there?

    Kipling's uncompromising lines are a reminder of the repeated folly of British interventions in Afghanistan, made grimly topical by the deaths of 100 soldiers now recorded in this latest conflict. Why do we never learn the lessons of history?

    The First Anglo-Afghan War (1838-42) ended with a British column 16,000 strong retreating from Kabul to Gandamak through the snow; there was one survivor. The Second Afghan War (1878-81) featured the massacre of our entire garrison in = Kabul and eventual withdrawal. The Third Afghan War (1919) ended in de facto independence for the Afghans. Nor were we the only rash adventurers: the Soviet Union, in the decade 1979-89, lost 469,685 men in its incursion into Afghanistan.

    So, why are we back in this killing ground yet again? The courage of our troops is universally acknowledged, but why are their lives being squandered? Britain’s only interest in Afghanistan is in the destruction of the heroin trade. The Taliban ruthlessly ended it; then we removed them, since when there have been bumper poppy crops. We claim we are exporting democracy, but that is not our legitimate role and few Afghans are interested.

    We are also exporting “our values”, which is what devout Muslims fear more than anything else. They do not want their daughters turned into tattooed, pierced, foul-mouthed, drunken ladettes. British taxpayers have been supporting a delegation of feminist busybodies, in Kabul to raise local women’s “consciousness”: a surer way of provoking jihad could not be imagined.

    The Taliban are “on the back foot” – again. Even if they are, their worst-case scenario is to retreat over the Pakistani border and regroup in Waziristan where they are the de facto government. From there they will resume the offensive when practicable. They have all the time in the world. When the International Security Assistance Force eventually and inevitably withdraws from Afghanistan, they will return and exterminate whatever ramshackle regime is left behind in Kabul.

    This is madness: the epitome of the narcissist aimlessness of Blair/Brownpolitik. Our troops, once again, are lions led by donkeys; but in this instance the donkeys are not their now highly professional officers, but the hopelessly inadequate and dishonest politicians who rule Britain and Europe. And this is the system we want to foist on Afghanistan…?

    http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/society...l-we-learn.htm

    Troll, I take it you aren't Gerald Warner?

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Should have just nuked the bastards in the first place.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cliphead
    replied
    Well said.

    Leave a comment:


  • Troll
    replied
    When you’re wounded and left on Afghanistan’s plains
    And the women come out to cut up what remains
    Jest roll to your rifle and blow out your brains
    An’ go to your Gawd like a soldier.


    British troops in Helmand: What are they doing there?

    Kipling's uncompromising lines are a reminder of the repeated folly of British interventions in Afghanistan, made grimly topical by the deaths of 100 soldiers now recorded in this latest conflict. Why do we never learn the lessons of history?

    The First Anglo-Afghan War (1838-42) ended with a British column 16,000 strong retreating from Kabul to Gandamak through the snow; there was one survivor. The Second Afghan War (1878-81) featured the massacre of our entire garrison in = Kabul and eventual withdrawal. The Third Afghan War (1919) ended in de facto independence for the Afghans. Nor were we the only rash adventurers: the Soviet Union, in the decade 1979-89, lost 469,685 men in its incursion into Afghanistan.

    So, why are we back in this killing ground yet again? The courage of our troops is universally acknowledged, but why are their lives being squandered? Britain’s only interest in Afghanistan is in the destruction of the heroin trade. The Taliban ruthlessly ended it; then we removed them, since when there have been bumper poppy crops. We claim we are exporting democracy, but that is not our legitimate role and few Afghans are interested.

    We are also exporting “our values”, which is what devout Muslims fear more than anything else. They do not want their daughters turned into tattooed, pierced, foul-mouthed, drunken ladettes. British taxpayers have been supporting a delegation of feminist busybodies, in Kabul to raise local women’s “consciousness”: a surer way of provoking jihad could not be imagined.

    The Taliban are “on the back foot” – again. Even if they are, their worst-case scenario is to retreat over the Pakistani border and regroup in Waziristan where they are the de facto government. From there they will resume the offensive when practicable. They have all the time in the world. When the International Security Assistance Force eventually and inevitably withdraws from Afghanistan, they will return and exterminate whatever ramshackle regime is left behind in Kabul.

    This is madness: the epitome of the narcissist aimlessness of Blair/Brownpolitik. Our troops, once again, are lions led by donkeys; but in this instance the donkeys are not their now highly professional officers, but the hopelessly inadequate and dishonest politicians who rule Britain and Europe. And this is the system we want to foist on Afghanistan…?
    Better?
    Last edited by Troll; 11 June 2008, 10:47.

    Leave a comment:


  • RichardCranium
    replied
    Originally posted by mrdonuts View Post
    no real justification! you seem to have forgotten about the jets they rammed into the WTC
    I think you'll find that those who rammed their jets into the WTC are dead.

    Also, the WTC was in the USA, not over here.

    It was not any specific nation's government that carried out that act. So why are we are war with Iraq & Afghanistan (and Iran soon, too)?

    Some rich Americans died so our squaddies have to die and thousands of Iraqi civilians have to die. Not in my name they don't.

    Now if this was about Tibet or Taiwan or East Timor or half of Africa, I'd feel differently. But it's not. It's about American big business and the oil industry.

    Leave a comment:


  • mrdonuts
    replied
    [QUOTE=BrilloPad;554204]
    Originally posted by mrdonuts View Post

    Those responsible for WTC came from Afghanistan. So why invade Iraq?

    War in Afghanistan is virtually unwinnable. As the Russians found out 25 years ago.
    ratewhore was referencing afghanistan - please stay on topic

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    [QUOTE=zeitghost;554282]
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post

    Stopped?

    Stopped?

    What is this stopped of which you speak.

    We needed all the opium we could grow to sell to the Chinese.

    It doesn't grow on trees you know...
    We've got to pay for the tea somehow!

    Leave a comment:


  • Tingles
    replied
    Perhaps David Icke was right?



    T

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by Cyberman View Post
    The current incumbants watch the pennies(eg: police pay, teacher's pay) but ignore the Billions (eg: selling our gold at a 7 Billion loss...thanks Gordon.. and reducing the EU rebate by Billions....thanks Bliar!!) and that will always been a recipe for disaster !!

    The Tories will have to save the day yet again !!!
    Having voted Tory at last 6 elections I see little difference between Tory and Labour. Both trying to occupy the middle ground.

    Leave a comment:


  • Cyberman
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    Was it Norman Lamont who said "A billion here - a billion there. Soon you are talking serious money"?

    The current incumbants watch the pennies(eg: police pay, teacher's pay) but ignore the Billions (eg: selling our gold at a 7 Billion loss...thanks Gordon.. and reducing the EU rebate by Billions....thanks Bliar!!) and that will always been a recipe for disaster !!

    The Tories will have to save the day yet again !!!

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X