Originally posted by expat
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Ohhh, so close!!!
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Ohhh, so close!!!"
Collapse
-
Thatcher would have been telling Bush what to do rather than visa versa though, and not basing decisions made on feelings or voices from God.
-
Well such as the present incumbent are so fond of retrospective taxation, perhaps we can force the argument for retrospective laws then.Originally posted by zathras View PostWe still don't because New Labour abolished capital punishment for Treason soon after coming to power
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Advocate View PostBut isn't it the Queen who gives royal ascent for laws etc?
Hate to do this, but it's assent. Royal ascent is something that happens to handmaidens' skirts and stableboys' trousers.
HTH
Leave a comment:
-
But isn't it the Queen who gives royal ascent for laws etc?Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostIf he is found guilty of treason then the laws he passed would be null and void which would include the prohibition of hanging for treason; so we could do it after all.
Personally, I’d prefer he was subject to the traditional hang, drawn and quartered with his head on a pike at the traitors gate of the Tower of London.
Leave a comment:
-
If he is found guilty of treason then the laws he passed would be null and void which would include the prohibition of hanging for treason; so we could do it after all.Originally posted by zathras View PostWe still don't because New Labour abolished capital punishment for Treason soon after coming to power
Personally, I’d prefer he was subject to the traditional hang, drawn and quartered with his head on a pike at the traitors gate of the Tower of London.
Leave a comment:
-
He's been to the Buddha Bar again.Originally posted by Advocate View PostEither you've reached some Zen like state, or been to the pub!
Mine's the jacket on the left, thanks...
Leave a comment:
-
Either you've reached some Zen like state, or been to the pub!Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostMaybe this IS the first time we discuss this and the one in the past was the repeat. We only think that the one in the past was the first time because we are conditioned to believe such things.
Leave a comment:
-
Liquid lunch again huh?Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View PostMaybe this IS the first time we discuss this and the one in the past was the repeat. We only think that the one in the past was the first time because we are conditioned to believe such things.
Leave a comment:
-
Maybe this IS the first time we discuss this and the one in the past was the repeat. We only think that the one in the past was the first time because we are conditioned to believe such things.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Today 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11
- Under the terms he was shackled by, Ray McCann’s Loan Charge Review probably is a fair resolution Jan 27 08:41
- Contractors, a £25million crackdown on rogue company directors is coming Jan 26 05:02


Leave a comment: