• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: Ohhh, so close!!!

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Ohhh, so close!!!"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by expat View Post
    What treason would that be then, apart from tax laws that displease you? He did nothing that Thatcher wouldn't have been happy to do (that's what was wrong).
    Thatcher would have been telling Bush what to do rather than visa versa though, and not basing decisions made on feelings or voices from God.

    Leave a comment:


  • expat
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
    Because we wouldn't have the opportunity to hang him for treason.
    What treason would that be then, apart from tax laws that displease you? He did nothing that Thatcher wouldn't have been happy to do (that's what was wrong).

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    Originally posted by zathras View Post
    We still don't because New Labour abolished capital punishment for Treason soon after coming to power
    Well such as the present incumbent are so fond of retrospective taxation, perhaps we can force the argument for retrospective laws then.

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by realityhack View Post

    Hate to do this, but it's assent. Royal ascent is something that happens to handmaidens' skirts and stableboys' trousers.

    HTH
    I'll get my orthopaedic shoes...

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by NickFitz View Post


    That reminds me of the Class War sticker:

    The Great Royal Debate

    Do we shoot them or do we hang them?
    In Bliar's case I suggest both.

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    But isn't it the Queen who gives royal ascent for laws etc?

    Hate to do this, but it's assent. Royal ascent is something that happens to handmaidens' skirts and stableboys' trousers.

    HTH

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    If he is found guilty of treason then the laws he passed would be null and void which would include the prohibition of hanging for treason; so we could do it after all.

    Personally, I’d prefer he was subject to the traditional hang, drawn and quartered with his head on a pike at the traitors gate of the Tower of London.
    But isn't it the Queen who gives royal ascent for laws etc?

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Originally posted by zathras View Post
    We still don't because New Labour abolished capital punishment for Treason soon after coming to power
    If he is found guilty of treason then the laws he passed would be null and void which would include the prohibition of hanging for treason; so we could do it after all.

    Personally, I’d prefer he was subject to the traditional hang, drawn and quartered with his head on a pike at the traitors gate of the Tower of London.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    How convenient....
    We could always hang him until he's "really poorly"....

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by zathras View Post
    We still don't because New Labour abolished capital punishment for Treason soon after coming to power
    How convenient....

    Leave a comment:


  • zathras
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
    Because we wouldn't have the opportunity to hang him for treason.
    We still don't because New Labour abolished capital punishment for Treason soon after coming to power

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by Advocate View Post
    Either you've reached some Zen like state, or been to the pub!
    He's been to the Buddha Bar again.

    Mine's the jacket on the left, thanks...

    Leave a comment:


  • Advocate
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Maybe this IS the first time we discuss this and the one in the past was the repeat. We only think that the one in the past was the first time because we are conditioned to believe such things.
    Either you've reached some Zen like state, or been to the pub!

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by HairyArsedBloke View Post
    Maybe this IS the first time we discuss this and the one in the past was the repeat. We only think that the one in the past was the first time because we are conditioned to believe such things.
    Liquid lunch again huh?

    Leave a comment:


  • HairyArsedBloke
    replied
    Maybe this IS the first time we discuss this and the one in the past was the repeat. We only think that the one in the past was the first time because we are conditioned to believe such things.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X