Originally posted by Moose423956
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: I like hats
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "I like hats"
Collapse
-
whsOriginally posted by TimberWolf View PostI've never worn a scarf (can't vouch for when I was a young nipper though). Nor flip-flops.
Leave a comment:
-
http://www.levinehat.com/images/medi...fedora_MED.jpg
http://www.marksandspencer.com/gp/pr...3812031&page=2Last edited by Bagpuss; 23 May 2008, 12:41.
Leave a comment:
-
Leave a comment:
-
Bigot!Originally posted by ace00 View PostI, however, dislike hats. Got no time for them at all. Don't get me started.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Superb site. Better than pornography!Originally posted by DS23 View Posthere's a hat website with a very bold claim:
"TOTALLY BIZARRE HATS
And A Few Bizarre Shirts
----- This Stuff Is Totally Cool -----
WE DON'T STOCK 'RUN-OF-THE-MILL' HATS ***
We sell HATS that make heads turn!!!!"
http://www.bizarrefun.com/Products%20FAH300A300.htm
of course, with a tag like that i thought this has to be the place for moose to mosey through...
Leave a comment:
-
here's a hat website with a very bold claim:
"TOTALLY BIZARRE HATS
And A Few Bizarre Shirts
----- This Stuff Is Totally Cool -----
WE DON'T STOCK 'RUN-OF-THE-MILL' HATS ***
We sell HATS that make heads turn!!!!"
http://www.bizarrefun.com/Products%20FAH300A300.htm
of course, with a tag like that i thought this has to be the place for moose to mosey through...
Leave a comment:
-
I've never worn a scarf (can't vouch for when I was a young nipper though). Nor flip-flops.Originally posted by ace00 View PostI, however, dislike hats. Got no time for them at all. Don't get me started.
Leave a comment:
-
I, however, dislike hats. Got no time for them at all. Don't get me started.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why contractors keep putting off their pension (and why I'm one of them) Aug 4 02:43
- HMRC loan charge settlement offer: 3 things to check before you sign Today 07:41
- HMRC standstill agreements extended to 72 months: why the term's doubled, and what to check before signing Jul 31 05:53
- Who owns the loans? Inside the mystery of the loan charge recall scandal Jul 30 06:20
- Umbrella company winding-up petitions in 2026: the practical guide for contractors Jul 29 05:29
- Payments on Account deadline: what contractors must do before July 31st — maybe for the final few times Jul 28 08:01
- Andy Burnham's first 100 days: five things contractors need from the new PM Jul 27 00:53
- Starmer vs Burnham on housing: What their rival plans mean for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- Burnham's housing vision vs. Starmer's home-buying reforms: what it means for your contractor mortgage Jul 22 00:59
- In Khalil v Innovate Transport, a limited company contractor wasn’t a worker and was on £2.30 — not £230 Jul 21 07:58

Leave a comment: