When clients turn to contractors they almost always want them to start yesterday.
Expecting military clients to plan ahead to allow for the time taken to gain clearance is unrealistic.
It is the expectation that they should do so, that is the problem that needs to be fixed.
tim
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Agencies asking for security clearance.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Agencies asking for security clearance."
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by oracleslave View Post
They blame their clients.
In some cases it seems to be true i.e. contract that has been advertised by lots of different agencies in 5 months, and in other cases it is clear the agency doesn't know what they are talking about i.e. advertising for a permanent role that has as a prerequiste security clearance.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by expat View Postas ever, the DVA says they should not ask for only candidates who have clearance, but agencies still do ask for it. It seems to me to hinge on a simple matter of fact:
Either:
1. DVA says they should invite all candidates, but in fact those with clearance will have a better chance, or in some cases the only chance. Then the agencies are making a sensible business decision, and DVA is stupid.
Or
2. Those without clearance always have the same chance as those with. Then the agencies are stupid.
Unfortunately I am not able to eliminate either party from the possible charge of rank stupidity.
http://www.contractoruk.com/news/003801.html
Leave a comment:
-
Agencies asking for security clearance.
as ever, the DVA says they should not ask for only candidates who have clearance, but agencies still do ask for it. It seems to me to hinge on a simple matter of fact:
Either:
1. DVA says they should invite all candidates, but in fact those with clearance will have a better chance, or in some cases the only chance. Then the agencies are making a sensible business decision, and DVA is stupid.
Or
2. Those without clearance always have the same chance as those with. Then the agencies are stupid.
Unfortunately I am not able to eliminate either party from the possible charge of rank stupidity.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Yesterday 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Yesterday 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
- IR35: Substitution — updated for 2025/26 Sep 18 05:45
Leave a comment: