• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "£64 to fill my car up"

Collapse

  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    We've had it too easy living off a carbon credit built up by the previous administration (the carboniferous period). The solution is to make oil more expensive. Either that or civilisation will breakdown as we know it, with death and pestilence closely followed. Doomed.

    p.s. You are all going to die.
    Hopefully not for a long time...

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    We've had it too easy living off a carbon credit built up by the previous administration (the carboniferous period). The solution is to make oil more expensive. Either that or civilisation will breakdown as we know it, with death and pestilence closely followed. Doomed.

    p.s. You are all going to die.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    That's fair enough, but I still think that a lot of my rant stands. Nearly all these ideas are still in the early experimentation and research phase, and every article one reads about even the most promising options is liberally sprinkled with the word "could".
    They have already proved a 40%~ conversion rate which to my mind isn't really a could.
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    We don't have an option which everyone can throw themselves behind. It's all, "This could work. We should have some idea in the next 5-10 years. Hopefully".
    In the current political environment alternative energy schemes are what you get funding for, no matter how ridiculous, or unlikely to succeed they may be. I suspect that the oil companies are not that worried about alternative energy sources because they know we have enough oil to last the foreseeable future, and expect to be able to get oil from another source when our current stocks run out.
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    I'm being pessimistic, I know, but we get through about 85 million barrels of oil per day at the moment, and that's just pumping the stuff straight out of the ground. It's going to be a challenge for the microalgae to produce that sort of output. And they have to be processed before you even get oil to send to the refineries.
    What is more expensive? Growing a load of algae and processing it in a refinery, or building an oil platform, drilling out oil and then transporting it back to the refinery?

    As far as I'm aware the current theory is that it is the microalgae that produce the oil in nature, this is why they started trying to produce oil from microalgae in the first place. If this is the case oil is not going to run out in the near future because it is being produced as we speak. They are already finding oil in oilfields that were previously though to have been drained.

    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    We're currently told that there is enough oil left in the ground for another 50-100 years... but prices of fuel and food are already rising to the point where a lot of people can't afford to eat. Interesting times.
    Fuel and food prices have very little to do with the amount of oil we may have left and a lot more to do with government mismanagement of the economy, tax, and the monopoly that is OPEC.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by dang65 View Post
    We're currently told that there is enough oil left in the ground for another 50-100 years... but prices of fuel and food are already rising to the point where a lot of people can't afford to eat. Interesting times.
    Yup, it's about time we had a revolution...

    (see you all in about 25 years when they let me out...)

    Leave a comment:


  • dang65
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
    Before you rubbish something next time you may want to do a bit of research and ensure that you are ranting about the right thing.
    That's fair enough, but I still think that a lot of my rant stands. Nearly all these ideas are still in the early experimentation and research phase, and every article one reads about even the most promising options is liberally sprinkled with the word "could".

    We don't have an option which everyone can throw themselves behind. It's all, "This could work. We should have some idea in the next 5-10 years. Hopefully".

    I'm being pessimistic, I know, but we get through about 85 million barrels of oil per day at the moment, and that's just pumping the stuff straight out of the ground. It's going to be a challenge for the microalgae to produce that sort of output. And they have to be processed before you even get oil to send to the refineries.

    We're currently told that there is enough oil left in the ground for another 50-100 years... but prices of fuel and food are already rising to the point where a lot of people can't afford to eat. Interesting times.

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by roadster198 View Post
    when I was last in the local RR dealer I spied a stealthy Overfinch RR Sport which the the salesman (RR/LR nut) comended me on recognising. It was a customers and had to wait a while on getting it however he put up with the boardom with buying an Audi RS4.... Aye its a wee shame for you my man and apprently he had this tuned in Germany after his overfinch arrived

    WHERE'S MY LOTTERY WIN FFS!!!
    The difference in cost per mile between diesel and petrol is 0.1p Now which would you prefer to drive?

    Leave a comment:


  • roadster198
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Just been on to Stratstone to find me a good 4.2 SC for around the same money.

    400bhp....!
    when I was last in the local RR dealer I spied a stealthy Overfinch RR Sport which the the salesman (RR/LR nut) comended me on recognising. It was a customers and had to wait a while on getting it however he put up with the boardom with buying an Audi RS4.... Aye its a wee shame for you my man and apprently he had this tuned in Germany after his overfinch arrived

    WHERE'S MY LOTTERY WIN FFS!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • Pinto
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Think Threaded size!
    Bloody Hell, now that's just greed!

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by roadster198 View Post
    Did you get your RR yet my man?
    Just been on to Stratstone to find me a good 4.2 SC for around the same money.

    400bhp....!

    Leave a comment:


  • roadster198
    replied
    Originally posted by Churchill View Post
    Nope, very liquid at the moment, and staying that way until I find the right pad!
    Did you get your RR yet my man?

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
    Easier to just grow some more algae?
    Fish would gobble it all up?

    Presumably those algal blooms one hears about every so often are shortly by a cod bloom or somesuch, and no more algae?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by NotAllThere View Post
    Wouldn't a shedload of land only be big enough for a shed?
    I'm talking about a mighty big shed! Think Threaded size!

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    How come we can't replicate what the algae (and other plants) do though?
    Easier to just grow some more algae?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by TimberWolf View Post
    How come we can't replicate what the algae (and other plants) do though?
    My ex-wifes cooking could do that. You'd never crap solid again!

    Leave a comment:


  • TimberWolf
    replied
    How come we can't replicate what the algae (and other plants) do though?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X