Vatican refuses to "crucify" terrorists

Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

sappatz replied

29 July 2005, 19:54
terrorism

this terrorism thing is a joke
Jews, Americans (civil war), Britons have practicised terrorism at various stages of their history.
without speaking of CIA-sponsored contras in honduras.
Leave a comment:
Bagpuss replied

29 July 2005, 12:48
Originally posted by wendigo100

Did they criticise Celtic the other night?

I'm not aware celtic ever blew anyone up. I may be wrong
Leave a comment:
wendigo100 replied

29 July 2005, 12:45
Originally posted by Bagpuss

Did they ever critisise the IRA?

Did they criticise Celtic the other night?
Leave a comment:
Mailman replied

29 July 2005, 12:37
The problem is...they havent kept their mouths shut.

They have pointed blamed Isreal in how they worded their reply.

I mean come on...lets be fair here...if the Vatican is going to leave Isreal out because of its past actions then why did they include Egypt there which has a history of supporting terrorism in the region (and has in fact attempted to invade Israel in the past only to have their arses handed to them big time).

Mailman
Leave a comment:
Not So Wise replied

29 July 2005, 12:31
Intelligent of them. One religion in the mix is bad enough, two is 100 times worse, 3 would be the end of the world. What goes on over there has nothing to do with the vatican and anything they say will be used against them by somebody.

So good on them for keeping their mouths shut, religions should stay out of politics, now if islam would do the same.
Leave a comment:
Bagpuss replied

29 July 2005, 12:29
Did they ever critisise the IRA?
Leave a comment:
Mailman started a topic Vatican refuses to "crucify" terrorists

29 July 2005, 12:26
Vatican refuses to "crucify" terrorists

I see the fools in the vatican have refused to criticise Palestinian acts of terrorism...thus granting them legitimacy.

Pitty really...the Vatican had a golden opportunity to drag itself in to the 21st century and make a definate stance against terrorism and what do they do...they criticise Israel and completely avoid criticising Palistinian terrorists.

Oh well...par for the course I guess.

Mailman
Tags: None