• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "UK Database of ALL phone calls and emails"

Collapse

  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by ratewhore View Post
    David Cameron?
    Oh dear!

    Are you some sort of lefty?

    Leave a comment:


  • KathyWoolfe
    replied
    How are they going to be able to monitor chat room exchanges?

    Or even bulletin board messages like this one.......

    Leave a comment:


  • ratewhore
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
    Precisely Marina!

    It's not the hapless clown in power you need to fear, it's the total maniac that comes after him.
    David Cameron?

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by Marina View Post
    Hindenburg was a good person, if a bit smug and geriatric, and he agreed to let Hitler & Co into government, believing along with his colleagues that "the little corporal" could be controlled.

    Marcus Tullius Cicero was a good person, if a bit smug and long-winded, and he agreed to support Octavian, believing along with his colleagues that "the boy" could be controlled.

    If I knew more history I've no doubt a dozen similar examples could be given of well-meaning people being elbowed aside by bold and ruthless interlopers, and lets not forget Brown and colleagues are craven, cowardly, insecure gits and almost certainly being pushed into this by the EU or even the US.
    Precisely Marina!

    It's not the hapless clown in power you need to fear, it's the total maniac that comes after him.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marina
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
    I pointed out that the jews in Germany in 1938 had done nothing wrong, but it didn't help them much.

    She countered that Gordon Brown was a good person, whereas Hitler & co were evil, so my argument was nonsense.

    I must admit I was rather floored by that one.
    Hindenburg was a good person, if a bit smug and geriatric, and he agreed to let Hitler & Co into government, believing along with his colleagues that "the little corporal" could be controlled.

    Marcus Tullius Cicero was a good person, if a bit smug and long-winded, and he agreed to support Octavian, believing along with his colleagues that "the boy" could be controlled.

    If I knew more history I've no doubt a dozen similar examples could be given of well-meaning people being elbowed aside by bold and ruthless interlopers, and lets not forget Brown and colleagues are craven, cowardly, insecure gits and almost certainly being pushed into this by the EU or even the US.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post


    f4j used that method alot - as far as we could tell never intercepted.
    Old spy trick:

    Wrap the letter in two sheets of old fashioned carbon copy paper. Stops the letter being read by holding up against a strong light and shows evidence of tampering.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
    send a letter in the post.


    f4j used that method alot - as far as we could tell never intercepted.

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    Yes, it's just the legal dotting of Is and crossing Ts to fit in with other things the government have signed up for.
    Indeed. Furthermore, I expect every developed country does this.

    If you want relatively secure communications, use ham radio (with a scrambler) or send a letter in the post.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    UK Database of ALL phone calls and emails


    I thought they already scanned them since as long as they/we have had the technology
    Yes, it's just the legal dotting of Is and crossing Ts to fit in with other things the government have signed up for.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    UK Database of ALL phone calls and emails


    I thought they already scanned them since as long as they/we have had the technology

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Spied on from cradle to grave.

    That's life in the shiny new crypto-Stalinist state that is the former United Kingdom.

    Had a row about this with a woman in the pub the other night who took the "if you've done nothing wrong there's nothing to worry about" line of 'reasoning'.

    She seemed happy to hand over her most intimate details, DNA and firstborn child to the security services in the interests of combating international terrorism.

    I pointed out that the jews in Germany in 1938 had done nothing wrong, but it didn't help them much.

    She countered that Gordon Brown was a good person, whereas Hitler & co were evil, so my argument was nonsense.

    I must admit I was rather floored by that one.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marina
    replied
    Is this just a summary log of call times, durations, and from and to numbers, or do they plan to record the call itself?

    GCHQ has recorded all international voice calls, and probably emails too, for years, and these are kept on a rolling six month cycle (maybe longer now).

    Leave a comment:


  • EternalOptimist
    replied
    Originally posted by realityhack View Post
    Haven't they been doing that for decades anyway?
    What's the difference if they just log the exchange and not the content?
    Maybe so, but the plan is to hold it all centrally in one big fck-off database.
    I dont think that happens at the moment





    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    Isn't it usual in situations like this that a bill is proposed in all its full glory, warts and all, and then after the expected outcry, gets watered down by our benevolent political masters for the good of the people ?

    Leave a comment:


  • realityhack
    replied
    Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Post
    IIRC the plan is to record the number you phoned and when, not the content of the call. The email adress you mailed and not the content.
    Haven't they been doing that for decades anyway?
    What's the difference if they just log the exchange and not the content?

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X