• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Freud painting sells for 17Mil"

Collapse

  • TimberWolf
    replied
    Cheap at twice the price, what a bargain. The subject is beautiful too.

    No way would I hang that sheite in my living room.

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post
    Kate Moss, for example?
    overrated, overpaid minger inho

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    It would be a rather boring painting if he decided to paint a very attractive woman (by todays standards). The attraction of many of his works is they are of interesting and everyday people i.e. homeless people.
    Kate Moss, for example?

    Leave a comment:


  • Bagpuss
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post
    I'm sorry ferret, for all of it's artistic merit I could never call it beautiful. Maybe it's because, as a woman, if I ever had a body like that, I would probably never get laid again...except by weirdos.
    It would be a rather boring painting if he decided to paint a very attractive woman (by todays standards). The attraction of many of his works is they are of interesting and everyday people i.e. homeless people.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
    Tut tut Lucy m'dear!

    Are you suggesting that lovers of the Rubenesque form are 'weirdos'?

    While I prefer not to have to roll my partners in flour prior to coitus, I don't think the men who do are necessarily weirdos.

    Let's face it. This is an increasingly common body type in the UK's female population.
    Bogey, she is not 'Rubenesque' she is obese, probably morbidly, and no, I don't think many men would go for that, curvy, yes, mobidly obese, no.

    Weirdos only.

    Rubenesque woman
    Last edited by Lucy; 14 May 2008, 15:37. Reason: added example

    Leave a comment:


  • bogeyman
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post
    I'm sorry ferret, for all of it's artistic merit I could never call it beautiful. Maybe it's because, as a woman, if I ever had a body like that, I would probably never get laid again...except by weirdos.
    Tut tut Lucy m'dear!

    Are you suggesting that lovers of the Rubenesque form are 'weirdos'?

    While I prefer not to have to roll my partners in flour prior to coitus, I don't think the men who do are necessarily weirdos.

    Let's face it. This is an increasingly common body type in the UK's female population.

    Leave a comment:


  • oracleslave
    replied
    Originally posted by ferret View Post
    Is a superb painting, could say it was a work of real beauty. Imagine not wanting that in your living room! Read that it was coming up for sale and in the article the subject said about going to see it and some art critic slagging it off - in that BBC article, well done Mr Robin:
    A superb painting, yes. A work of beauty, yes. The subject is ugly though.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by ferret View Post
    Is a superb painting, could say it was a work of real beauty. Imagine not wanting that in your living room! Read that it was coming up for sale and in the article the subject said about going to see it and some art critic slagging it off - in that BBC article, well done Mr Robin:
    I'm sorry ferret, for all of it's artistic merit I could never call it beautiful. Maybe it's because, as a woman, if I ever had a body like that, I would probably never get laid again...except by weirdos.

    Leave a comment:


  • ferret
    replied
    Is a superb painting, could say it was a work of real beauty. Imagine not wanting that in your living room! Read that it was coming up for sale and in the article the subject said about going to see it and some art critic slagging it off - in that BBC article, well done Mr Robin:

    Ms Tilley has modelled for Lucian Freud on several occasions. She recalled a time overhearing a critique of her in another Freud painting.

    "The man was so mortified. It was the Whitechapel Gallery. There'd been a big exhibition on and my painting had just been finished, so they put it in for the last week.

    "So I went with my friends to see it, and there was this man - you know those so-called art lecturers who think they know everything - 'yes, this painting was painted because Lucian hated women, so he put the dog high up and the woman was lying on the floor. The poor thing with all her scabs and spots'.

    "I started laughing. He was going 'excuse me madam' and I said, 'well actually that's me'.

    "Poor man, he thought was going to fall through a hole in the floor.

    "He said: 'oh but you're really pretty in real life.'"

    Leave a comment:


  • wobbegong
    replied
    The 1995 Freud painting depicts rotund London benefits supervisor Sue Tilley, now 51, sleeping on a dilapidated sofa.

    Ms Tilley, now a Jobcentre manager, said: "I'm thrilled. I still can't believe such a bizarre thing has happened to me. It hasn't sunk in properly."
    Unlike all those cakes and pies, eh Sue?

    Leave a comment:


  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by hyperD View Post
    I wonder how much I can get for this graphic artwork?

    Plumper
    I feel sick now...

    Leave a comment:


  • hyperD
    replied
    I wonder how much I can get for this graphic artwork?

    Plumper

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by Bagpuss View Post
    She is most likely a regular at the pub, he tends to paint people he knows or has befriended. Theres something quite renaissance about his style at the same time he's very contemporary which I like.


    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by bogeyman View Post
    Mind you, 17M is taking the urine a bit. I wonder how much the corpulent lady got in sitting (lounging?) fees?
    .
    In addition to her £20 a day fees, she's also got a signed full size print (according to the BBC this morning) which bailiffs refused to take at one point, instead preferring her TV and a kettle.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by sasguru View Post
    Must be like looking in a mirror for you.

    Bada-boom!
    You have me confused with your girlfriend again, sas.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X