• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "All your kinks are belong to us"

Collapse

  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by BrilloPad View Post
    yet more rules to torment joe public - while the dangerous types carry on at will.

    I thought it wasn't that long ago that they relaxed the laws so only stuff involving kids or animals was likely to be confiscated, if brought back from abroad for example.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post
    How long have you been coming here?
    Don't know, can't remember my goldfishes names either.

    I thought your 'issues' (apart from your knee of course) were more mental than physical. Anyone that drives an Elise is hardly going to be way overweight, so I can't imagine your legs being that bad. In fact in my imagination, they're very very nice.

    Leave a comment:


  • BrilloPad
    replied
    yet more rules to torment joe public - while the dangerous types carry on at will.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    Mel Gibsons Payback would certainly be under question.

    That's a better movie than I was expecting. Lucy Lui in bondage gear was also worth a repeat viewing.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    Didn't notice the legs at first.

    They look a bit on the thin side to me. You're not another screwed up woman you doesn't like being 'normal'?
    How long have you been coming here?

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post
    That is good, I wish my legs were that thin

    Didn't notice the legs at first.

    They look a bit on the thin side to me. You're not another screwed up woman you doesn't like being 'normal'?

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Originally posted by PAH View Post
    I prefer this one (which some may find NSFW):

    http://www.offensivefunny.com/images...at-me-elmo.jpg

    Almost had it as my avatar when I first saw it, but thought it a bit riskey.

    Some other amusing images on that site too for those that aren't at work.
    That is good, I wish my legs were that thin

    Leave a comment:


  • The Lone Gunman
    replied
    An act which threatens or appears to threaten a person's life
    This line of the law seems to threaten 90% of all holywood output at the moment.
    It will not be long before some self righteous git is screaming for the law to be applied to mainstream movies.
    Mel Gibsons Payback would certainly be under question.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by Lucy View Post

    I prefer this one (which some may find NSFW):

    http://www.offensivefunny.com/images...at-me-elmo.jpg

    Almost had it as my avatar when I first saw it, but thought it a bit riskey.

    Some other amusing images on that site too for those that aren't at work.

    Leave a comment:


  • Board Game Geek
    replied
    For a laugh, I sent a copy of the photo of the couple having a pillow fight to the assessment unit at the authority where I work.



    This is what they replied back :

    In the picture you submitted for review, there are a number of elements which give cause for concern.

    1) Domestic Violence is portrayed in the picture. It appears that the female is in the aggressor role, since she has a height advantage and also because the male is in a defensive role, attempting to shield himself from imminent attack. <organisation> has partner links with http://www.mensadviceline.org.uk/ and more information can be found there.

    2) Judging from the picture, the male is half in the bed, and it can be surmised that he has made an inappropriate sexual remark to the female, regardless of their relationship. Hence, the female may be reacting to reinforce her non-compliance with his sexual demands. So whilst the image may indicate a couple “at play”, there is always a darker and more sinister meaning to innocuous pictures, which need to be interpreted by the viewer.

    Leave a comment:


  • Lucy
    replied
    Giving everyone the wrong idea...

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by ThomasSoerensen View Post
    you looked for bicycle parts on that website - I think I don't believe you

    He mispelled it "dykes". It's an easy mistake, Holland's full of both.

    Leave a comment:


  • PAH
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post

    One of my all-time favourite websites. Don't think that link will be around for long though, so get stuck in while you can!

    Leave a comment:


  • ThomasSoerensen
    replied
    Originally posted by threaded View Post
    you looked for bicycle parts on that website - I think I don't believe you

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    NSFW Melanie vs Olga

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X