Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Can anyone identify the source of this, one of the most fantastic quotes of all time? The first in with an answer can collect +50 Xeno geek points. No Googling now!
Can anyone identify the source of this, one of the most fantastic quotes of all time? The first in with an answer can collect +50 Xeno geek points. No Googling now!
Statistically I think this is right, since there are more ways of being wrong than right. Thought the chances of me being wrong here are of course higher than being right.
"Don't you ever get tired of being right?"
"No, only with the rest of you being wrong."
Can anyone identify the source of this, one of the most fantastic quotes of all time? The first in with an answer can collect +50 Xeno geek points. No Googling now!
whatever you do you are wrong - like being married...
Statistically I think this is right, since there are more ways of being wrong than right. Thought the chances of me being wrong here are of course higher than being right.
The confusion stems from scientists pourly designing their own trials and analysing them. Often there is a unknown confounding factor that may be the underlying cause this is often not allowed for in the design or in the analysis. However, some studies are done correctly expalining why we are often presented with contradictory results.
I could set up a poorly designed trial to 'prove' shopping at Iceland gives you lung cancer.
It's the scientific method. Try everything possible and only the fittest ideas survive. Religion is much the same except not updated as often and they keep the dross in too.
The confusion stems from scientists poorly designing their own trials and analysing them. Often there is a unknown confounding factor that may be the underlying cause this is often not allowed for in the design or in the analysis. However, some studies are done correctly expalining why we are often presented with contradictory results. Unfortunately scientific journal articles are not always reviewed by Statisticians, I've seen some shockers.
I could set up a poorly designed trial to 'prove' shopping at Iceland gives you lung cancer, and then one to disprove it.
Leave a comment: