- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Shock breaking news
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Shock breaking news"
Collapse
-
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View Posthey, I tell the jokes around here
Where
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostCar seats should face the other way, so there's no need for a seatbelt.
And if you're wondering, people can always drive in reverse if they want to see where they're going.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostA friend of mine always wears one of those big neck things when he drives, you know the big polo whiplash things. On the principle that if they help with whiplash they are probably preventative also.
looks a right narner he does
And if you're wondering, people can always drive in reverse if they want to see where they're going.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by EternalOptimist View PostA friend of mine always wears one of those big neck things when he drives, you know the big polo whiplash things. On the principle that if they help with whiplash they are probably preventative also.
looks a right narner he does
Seen quite a few racing drivers use them, so may not be as dumb as he looks!
Of course, he'll not be able to put in a lovely big claim for personal injury damages quite so easily, which I though was one of the few perks of being rear-ended.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostThere would have to be an upward component of force to launch you upward. If occupants were launched into their seats, factalities would be rare, though whiplash is something to be avoided
Re seatbelts, true, the reasoning being that the car body acts as the bungie while you are held still in the body of the car, rather than for example decerating rapidly when forehead meets dashboard. This system works well as long as the car doesn't stop too fast. Still, it's a moot point for Diana since she wasn't wearing a seat belt.
A friend of mine always wears one of those big neck things when he drives, you know the big polo whiplash things. On the principle that if they help with whiplash they are probably preventative also.
looks a right narner he does
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostBecause they'd like the seatbelt to restrain you rather than launching you back out through the rear window...
Re seatbelts, true, the reasoning being that the car body acts as the bungie while you are held still in the body of the car, rather than for example decerating rapidly when forehead meets dashboard. This system works well as long as the car doesn't stop too fast. Still, it's a moot point for Diana since she wasn't wearing a seat belt.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ASB View PostQuite obviously he was in the pay of Phil the Greek. no other possible explanation.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TimberWolf View PostI wonder why they don't make seat belts out of bungie cord so that the accelerations (and other derivatives of position) are less?
With it being a Merc, you'd think there would be airbags on the back of the front seats, especially in these limo class saloons where the rear passengers are less likely to want to wear seat belts.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MrRobin View PostIf you're going to be pedantic then actually she was killed by her organs rupturing by massive trauma to the body caused by a high impact collision with a leather clad metal frame.
Leave a comment:
-
Is it not obvious that the body guard must have done it. After all he's the only one who survived - obvious conclusion right.
Before the car began it's journey, the J. Paul deliberately, but mildly intoxicated by alchol and other substances. The paparazi had been infiltrated by other elements that would follow with fast aggressive tactics. J. Paul was goaded to go faster....
So here's what happened. Shortly before the crash, he (bodyguard) put on his belt, then took out the driver with a blow to the neck (he was trained in the martial arts) , then took control of the speeding car, crashing it into a pillar to cause maximum damage. He was injured, but survived and faked memory loss. Why did this happen - we may never know.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by AtW View PostThe costs of this extra investigation should have been charged on Al Faed - he is very wealthy and it was him who demanded this investigation in the first place, it should have been a pre-requisite condition that he foots the bill if his whacky theory is incorrect. Frankly I am amazed that this did not happen. Fulham is going down too, which is nice.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Secondary NI threshold sinking to £5,000: a limited company director’s explainer Dec 24 09:51
- Reeves sets Spring Statement 2025 for March 26th Dec 23 09:18
- Spot the hidden contractor Dec 20 10:43
- Accounting for Contractors Dec 19 15:30
- Chartered Accountants with MarchMutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants with March Mutual Dec 19 15:05
- Chartered Accountants Dec 19 15:05
- Unfairly barred from contracting? Petrofac just paid the price Dec 19 09:43
- An IR35 case law look back: contractor must-knows for 2025-26 Dec 18 09:30
- A contractor’s Autumn Budget financial review Dec 17 10:59
Leave a comment: