Instead of building up...why dont they just make their floors deeper
Mailman
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Council bring couple to their knees
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Council bring couple to their knees"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by MailmanAnd what about taking 18 months to get a no...thats just a joke.
Leave a comment:
-
Doesnt sound like there are any good grounds NOT to give these guys permission though. And what about taking 18 months to get a no...thats just a joke.
Mailman
Leave a comment:
-
Would have thought they'd notice things like that when viewing potential new homes -or did they only view it from the outside?
Leave a comment:
-
Agreed, sounds like sour grapes. They shoudn't have assumed they would get planning permission.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by BagpussPeople were small a century or two ago
If these people wanted high ceilings then why did they buy a rabbit hutch?
Leave a comment:
-
They could always knock two rooms into one. Problem is with the 14' ceilings
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wendigo100Another one near Aberdeen. Are they mostly dwarves up there then?
Have you never seen houses with low seeings and sub 6ft doorways in England?
People were small a century or two ago
Leave a comment:
-
It sounds like they've bought a nice twee farm/cottage.
Serves the pretentious twats right, they should've bought a proper house!
Leave a comment:
-
Another one near Aberdeen. Are they mostly dwarves up there then?
Leave a comment:
-
I can sympathise. The house we had in the sticks outside Aberdeen had low ceilings and doorways. My parents took the step of digging down, to lower the floors when they were doing their house up.
Leave a comment:
-
Councillor Jenny Watson, the shortest committee member at 5ft, said that claims that the family’s application fell under the council’s disability policy were “stretching it a bit”.
“If I was 6ft 10in I wouldn’t have to take a run and jump for stuff in the supermarket rather than wait for somebody tall to come along and take it down. The world is made for tall people,” she said.
Leave a comment:
-
surely the ceiling can't be lower than 7 ft?
I can see 7 ft being a bit small then.
Leave a comment:
-
well done buddy, that is probably the least interesting story I have heard this week!
And I do work with some bores here! Takes some beating!
"should try harder" indeed.....
Leave a comment:
-
Council bring couple to their knees
Council bring couple to their knees
By A Scotland Correspondent
A COUPLE who are too tall for their house condemned councillors yesterday for refusing them permission to make it bigger.
Brian and Fiona Culbert, who are 6ft 10in and 6ft, can not stand up in their house in Lumphanan, Aberdeenshire. Mr Culbert, 36, a groundsman, has to get down on his hands and knees to shave or to get into the shower. Mrs Culbert, a social worker, has to stoop to reach the cooker and to do the dishes.
But their plans for an extension have been rejected by Aberdeenshire councillors who decided that the style of the building was not in keeping with the area and disputed claims that the application fell under its disability policy.
Mrs Culbert, 31, said: “Our health could be at risk if we’re not allowed to do something about the house. We don’t want a fancy extension; we just want somewhere that’s big enough for us to stand up in. It’s not much to ask.”
The Culberts realised their dream of moving into a remote farm steading three years ago. They bought goats, sheep and chickens and instantly fell in love with the pace of country life. They soon realised, however, that the house was not big enough.
They thought that an extension, with a square mansard roof which would allow them to stand up, was the answer. They waited 18 months for the development plans, which include a new bathroom, kitchen and utility room, to go through the planning process.
Mrs Culbert, who has two young sons, said: “If the boys take after us and shoot up in height we’re scuppered. We’re really settled here and don’t want to to leave but we’re going to have to come up with some kind of solution.”
Rosemary McIlwhan, director of the Scottish Centre for Human Rights, said that families had a right to enjoy their home. “The council needs to have a very good reason for not allowing this extension,” she said.
Councillor Marcus Humphrey, 6ft 2in and chairman of the Marr area committee, said: “We have sympathy but planning laws are planning laws. There are alternatives and the whole point is that these can be investigated and the couple can come back to us.”
Councillor Jenny Watson, the shortest committee member at 5ft, said that claims that the family’s application fell under the council’s disability policy were “stretching it a bit”.
“If I was 6ft 10in I wouldn’t have to take a run and jump for stuff in the supermarket rather than wait for somebody tall to come along and take it down. The world is made for tall people,” she said.
“I have a friend who is 6ft 7in and he’s never had a problem getting a house that’s big enough; you just buy a bigger house.”
------
WTF -- surely there are minimum height standards in housing, and surely the ceiling can't be lower than 7 ft? Good thing we are not all as tall as SpodTags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
- An IR35 bill of £19m for National Resources Wales may be just the tip of its iceberg Nov 7 09:20
Leave a comment: