- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: You’re barred.
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "You’re barred."
Collapse
-
Not really what I'm saying, I don't necessarily agree with the reasons for the rise, but it's a political move any of the parties would have made in the current climate of newspapers, pressure groups etc screaming about binge drinking culture and low alcohol prices - even tescos are saying alcohol is too cheap ffs.
-
Drink is much cheaper in France for example and they don't have a binge drinking culture.Originally posted by snaw View PostDumb campaign - in the current binge drinking climate any chancellor, no matter which party was in power would have done something similar.
In real terms alcohol has dropped significantly over the last 20 years or so, since it's not been rising with inflation so whacking a couple of extra percent above inflation on it makes no odds.
That's not to say I agree with the rise, but the campaign is plain opportunism - there are many other things they could get the tw@t on, but raising beer prices isn't really one of them.
It's just another tax rise simple as that. Will affect libours core supporters more, so a bit of an own goal. What about putting up taxes on food as in the current fat bastard climate any chancellor should consider something similar.
Leave a comment:
-
Dumb campaign - in the current binge drinking climate any chancellor, no matter which party was in power would have done something similar.
In real terms alcohol has dropped significantly over the last 20 years or so, since it's not been rising with inflation so whacking a couple of extra percent above inflation on it makes no odds.
That's not to say I agree with the rise, but the campaign is plain opportunism - there are many other things they could get the tw@t on, but raising beer prices isn't really one of them.
Leave a comment:
-
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Contractor loan demands: Is W28 playing litigation roulette? Yesterday 16:01
- Sean’s Story: He settled his contractor loans. Then they were sold for about £10. Now he’s being chased for £131,000 Oct 8 05:12
- Contractors warned as HMRC petitions to wind up ‘FCSA umbrella’ MyPay Oct 7 05:06
- As JSL squeezes small umbrella companies, Healey must act Oct 6 03:43
- Healey’s Budget 2026 to-do list for IT contractor hiring Oct 5 05:05
- Contracting Awards 2026 winners: 2025’s victors refuse to let go Oct 2 06:23
- Autumn Budget 2026: 10 predictions for UK contractors Sep 29 00:08
- Is HMRC ‘cruelly seeking to transfer debts’ to MSC contractors? Sep 28 06:37
- IT contractor demand climbed in August 2026 to 40-month high Sep 25 04:53
- Foreign Office puts 90% inside IR35 amid £15m bill: 5 steps for you Sep 24 01:11


Leave a comment: