• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "Heather Mills 'inconsistent, inaccurate witness' in Paul McCartney divorce case"

Collapse

  • Churchill
    replied
    Originally posted by SueEllen View Post
    I suppose judge's aren't allow to call women gold diggers.
    No, the term "Blatant Opportunist" usually suffices...

    Leave a comment:


  • SueEllen
    replied
    I suppose judge's aren't allow to call women gold diggers.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bumfluff
    replied
    Wow I read the report and Im not supprised Heather Mills didnt want it published, she didnt want to protect her kid but herself, the judge rips her too pieces more or less calling her a fantasist and lier.

    Leave a comment:


  • Chantho
    replied
    Not half as "dyer" as that post....

    Leave a comment:


  • Mailman
    replied
    I wouldnt mind being inconsistent if it meant Id get a £24mil bung!

    For that kind of money, a judge could call me a dirty contractor!

    Mailman

    Leave a comment:


  • AtW
    replied
    Ok, I will say what I meant...

    Heather










    was





















    a






















    bloody



















    dyer!

    Leave a comment:


  • Shimano105
    replied
    Wimp, say what you mean and be done. She won't sue you for that assertion until SKA is making you millions. Like I say, you'll never have anything to fear

    Leave a comment:


  • Heather Mills 'inconsistent, inaccurate witness' in Paul McCartney divorce case

    The judge who heard the Heather Mills and Sir Paul McCartney divorce case has said that Miss Mills was an "inaccurace and inconsistent" witness.

    Previously unknown details of the divorce settlement have been made public in Mr Justice Bennett's full judgment, after a court refused Miss Mills's application for secrecy.

    Heather Mills speaks to the media outside the High Court in central London
    Telegraph TV: Outside court Heather Mills spent11 minutes attacking Sir Paul and the legal system

    In it, the judge states that the former model's evidence was "not just inconsistent and inaccurate but also less than candid. Overall she was a less than impressive witness." (AtW's comment: nice eloquent way to put it that she was a bloody ***r, at least that's my view...)

    The judge described Sir Paul evidence as "balanced". He said: "He expressed himself moderately though at times with justifiable irritation, if not anger. He was consistent, accurate and honest."

    However, Mr Justice Bennett said: "But I regret to have to say I cannot say the same about the wife's evidence.

    More here: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.../nmacca518.xml

    ----

    Looks like Heather did not impress the judge - and the fact that she hates female lawyer of Paul will certainly help that lawyer double her rates - not only she wins in court but also pisses off the ex!

Working...
X