Originally posted by wobbegong
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: I Wonder Why..
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "I Wonder Why.."
Collapse
-
Normally in cases where in the judge's expert opinion the evidence is weak or non-admissable (and arguably the case should not have gone to trial at all), the jury has been prejudiced, or there are technical objections on the points of law involved. Quite rightly too, otherwise defendants can be fixed up on ropey evidence.
-
I wonder why . . .
A judge is allowed to order a jury to return a specified verdict.
Why bother having a jury?
Leave a comment:
-
Ask Spod....Originally posted by John Galthttp://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4681891.stm[/URL]
The judge in the railtrack corporate manslaughter trial has ordered the jury to find all men charged not guilty but could not make public his reasons for doing so - I wonder why.
Leave a comment:
-
I Wonder Why..
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4681891.stm
The judge in the railtrack corporate manslaughter trial has ordered the jury to find all men charged not guilty but could not make public his reasons for doing so - I wonder why.Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Andy Burnham as prime minister ‘would cut both ways for self-employed contractors’ Today 02:18
- The 3 highest-paying software contractor jobs right now, and what they actually pay Yesterday 15:52
- Taxman tells contractors that only four new tax avoidance schemes needed avoiding in Q2 Yesterday 05:47
- VAT compliance checks are changing — here’s what contractors need to know Jun 17 07:30
- As HMRC steps up VAT compliance activity, how should company directors prepare? Jun 16 06:52
- Hiring of IT contractors returned to growth in May 2026, following 33 months ‘in the red’ Jun 15 06:02
- Zero Hours Contract Reform: A key consultation for recruiters, employers and contractors is finally here Jun 12 04:43
- Bills of Exchange: Here’s what caught my attention as an umbrella compliance expert Jun 11 03:46
- Loan charge recall issue returns, with new demands making UK contractors ‘half-suicidal’ Jun 10 03:58
- AI interviews are here. Here's how IT contractors can ace them Jun 9 06:53

Leave a comment: