• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

Reply to: facade

Collapse

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "facade"

Collapse

  • rootsnall
    replied
    Milan, calmed down now !? Pity I missed the posts but us in the old fangled world are wrapped up and logged off by 4pm sharp each day.

    Leave a comment:


  • threaded
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    My client is up themselves over virtualisation ...

    Milan.
    I could tell you lots of horror stories from one of my clients who are deeply in lurv wi' this virtualisation bollox as well.

    Yet, whilst writing this, realised the client and their service provider (one of the usual suspects) could be easily identified.

    As they pay really well, I'll save it for another time.

    threaded in "contractor rodeo" mode.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    hello Joe,

    how are you ?

    how is brussels ?

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Joe Black
    replied
    Nice bit of tidying up there Milan. Shame Google has already indexed it all:

    http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=milanbenes+cuk

    Leave a comment:


  • Diver
    replied
    Sleep now

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post



    Milan.
    Shhhh

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied



    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ruprect
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    quite

    Milan.


    Quiet Milan

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    quite

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by milanbenes View Post
    nah faqqer, not my job to tell them what they don't want to hear

    hence the facade will continue and long may it continue and for as long it continues it will be good and therefore it is good

    and that's how it was, and that's how it continued

    Misk, it's not only heap size there are a zillion jave tuning parameters in .Net

    Milan.
    In that case, stay schtum and count the cash.

    This time nexr year, etc.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    nah faqqer, not my job to tell them what they don't want to hear

    hence the facade will continue and long may it continue and for as long it continues it will be good and therefore it is good

    and that's how it was, and that's how it continued

    Misk, it's not only heap size there are a zillion jave tuning parameters in .Net

    Milan.

    Leave a comment:


  • DimPrawn
    replied
    Have you tried upgrading to Vista. It's got some really nice graphics.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheFaQQer
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    That is spooky - I was going to suggest that, but I thought it was a bit too geeky.

    Instead, I'll make a geek joke.

    Milan, your servers are a complete cluster****
    Or GridControl for your Oracle database, or Real Application Clusters if you are on the older technology.



    So, in answer to the original question - still no. If the client needs to be told, then tell them. It may be that you need to look at the whole solution though.

    Failing that, turn the tape over, and use that.

    Leave a comment:


  • minsky1
    replied
    Milan

    The problem is your heap size - the performance issues are one of garbage collection and inneficient code - dont you know...

    We get this all the time with dodgy developers. All you get back is "you need better tin, or upgrade the JVM to the latest patch, its not our fault".

    Hope that's "finalized" things for you.

    Leave a comment:


  • milanbenes
    replied
    lads,


    so that means, it must be good


    Milan.
    Last edited by milanbenes; 6 March 2008, 16:29.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X