- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: China to raise military spending
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "China to raise military spending"
Collapse
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostLinky here China says it plans to increase military spending by nearly 18% this year to 417bn yuan ($59bn; £30bn).
The figure was revealed ahead of China's annual parliamentary session, which begins on Wednesday.
But experts believe the actual amount allocated to the Chinese military is two to three times larger than the published figure.
and on the other side of the world, the US spends close to half a trillion dollers per year on "defense"*
*Quotes cause last time I looked invasion != defense
Leave a comment:
-
I think the otherside of this is that the Chinese military is also massively outdated...so they have to increase spending to bring the vast bulk of their armed forces in to the late 19th century
Mailman
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostIt just doesn't make sense.
For a communist government the army is a simple way of absorbing the unemployed into employment.
Then theres all the factories making the guns and ammunition and other equipment.
Oh, and that pesky rebel island just off their coast
Leave a comment:
-
Either that or they could just be increasing the "published" figure to be more inline with the real figure.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Board Game Geek View PostLinky here China says it plans to increase military spending by nearly 18% this year to 417bn yuan ($59bn; £30bn).
The figure was revealed ahead of China's annual parliamentary session, which begins on Wednesday.
But experts believe the actual amount allocated to the Chinese military is two to three times larger than the published figure.
Critics also complain that China is not open enough about what it is spending the money on.
Most of this year's increase would be spent on increasing salaries and accommodating higher oil prices, said Jiang Enzhu, a spokesman for the National People's Congress.
He said spending on armaments would rise moderately
---------------------------------------
I know, I know, NickyG will be having a field day with this one.
However, a thought did cross my mind.
If I was the most promising, rising industrialised nation on the earth, with the biggest army and nukes, and had nothing to worry about...why on earth would I want to further increase military spending on more soldiers, nukes, etc..when I had more than anyone else in the first place ?
It just doesn't make sense.
Or....does it ?
Take it away Nicky....
Leave a comment:
-
China to raise military spending
Linky here China says it plans to increase military spending by nearly 18% this year to 417bn yuan ($59bn; £30bn).
The figure was revealed ahead of China's annual parliamentary session, which begins on Wednesday.
But experts believe the actual amount allocated to the Chinese military is two to three times larger than the published figure.
Critics also complain that China is not open enough about what it is spending the money on.
Most of this year's increase would be spent on increasing salaries and accommodating higher oil prices, said Jiang Enzhu, a spokesman for the National People's Congress.
He said spending on armaments would rise moderately
---------------------------------------
I know, I know, NickyG will be having a field day with this one.
However, a thought did cross my mind.
If I was the most promising, rising industrialised nation on the earth, with the biggest army and nukes, and had nothing to worry about...why on earth would I want to further increase military spending on more soldiers, nukes, etc..when I had more than anyone else in the first place ?
It just doesn't make sense.
Or....does it ?
Take it away Nicky....Tags: None
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Streamline Your Retirement with iSIPP: A Solution for Contractor Pensions Sep 1 09:13
- Making the most of pension lump sums: overview for contractors Sep 1 08:36
- Umbrella company tribunal cases are opening up; are your wages subject to unlawful deductions, too? Aug 31 08:38
- Contractors, relabelling 'labour' as 'services' to appear 'fully contracted out' won't dupe IR35 inspectors Aug 31 08:30
- How often does HMRC check tax returns? Aug 30 08:27
- Work-life balance as an IT contractor: 5 top tips from a tech recruiter Aug 30 08:20
- Autumn Statement 2023 tipped to prioritise mental health, in a boost for UK workplaces Aug 29 08:33
- Final reminder for contractors to respond to the umbrella consultation (closing today) Aug 29 08:09
- Top 5 most in demand cyber security contract roles Aug 25 08:38
- Changes to the right to request flexible working are incoming, but how will contractors be affected? Aug 24 08:25
Leave a comment: