Originally posted by wendigo100
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Blackwashed
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Blackwashed"
Collapse
-
-
Re: great Swedish footballers in history
Originally posted by WageSlaveGunnar Nordahl, Gunnar Gren and Nils Liedholm.
Are they from the 1958 team?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Alf WExcuse me but don't New Zealand pick the best players from pretty much the whole of the Pacific Ocean islands? There was talk of putting together a Pacific team for the Tri-Nations which would put the All Blacks back to a similar level to Argentina.
Any, most people just assume people from New Zealand are Aussies anyway.
The one Islander that wasnt borne here was picked up by Wesley Boys college in Auckland a number of years ago (and he had to go through a waiting period before he could be selected). Of course the English media neglect to say that Wesley Boys College has always offered scholarships to Island children who are both strong in school and sports activities.
Then lets not even get in to the arguement about how NZ is just another Pacific Island and also has the largest population of Pacific Islanders in the world.
If the IRB was so concerned about growing the sport in the Pacific Islands why arent they investing more money in their game? Ill tell you why, because the IRB isnt interested in growing the game in the Pacific Islands.
Secondly, if England was so concerned about Islanders being selected to play at international levels then perhaps you guys should start looking to your own islands. Im sure you could russle up a couple good players from Jersey, the orkneys, Falklands and the Shetland Islands. If you cant then perhaps you should grant these people their independance?
Why are so many of you lot over here AND never want to go back? All the Kiwis I know are going to live in Aussie after the UK kicks them out...
Regards
MailmanLast edited by Mailman; 12 July 2005, 14:07.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by WageSlaveAlso an Aussie colleague of mine just here tells me that even at soccer Australia are better than England as the last time they played, Australia won. Can't comment on that but he seems pretty sure of this fact.
Your colleague's statement doesn't deserve a serious reply. That would be like saying Holland are better at cricket than NZ, because they beat them once.
The game against Australia was a friendly, and under Sven friendlies are completely meaningless; he uses them as an opportunity to test different players and tactics.
England are a very strong team. The fact that we don't dominate is simply because football is a game played around the world and there are a number of exceptionally strong nations that could win the World Cup; Argentina, Brazil, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Holland, England -and then a number of strong nations just behind that group; Portugal, Czech Republic, etc.
By contrast, the number of great teams in rugby can be counted on a few fingers.
England usually do well in the major competitions, whereas Australia never qualify (despite being in a qualifying region with the Cook Islands!!!).
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wendigo100I'm not sure I agree with you there. Those countries tend to specialise in fewer sports. How many great Swedish footballers in history can you name, and how many great Dutch tennis players?
Australians have warm weather all the year round, so their kids can go out and play impromptu games with their mates any time they like. Think cricket - how often do you see kids in the UK having a knock-about, learning ball-skills at the genuine "grass-roots" level?
So it is surfing, footy beer and cricket for your average Aussie. We certainly do not have the right balance, but I believe that the Aussies are further from a decent balanced society than we are.
The Lions lost fair and square and there are no questions about who was the better team, but before the Aussies and Kiwis start saying that their teams are coming from a disadvantaged base compared to the UK, then we can all play that game.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by wendigo100How many great Swedish footballers in history can you name?
Leave a comment:
-
Also an Aussie colleague of mine just here tells me that even at soccer Australia are better than England as the last time they played, Australia won. Can't comment on that but he seems pretty sure of this fact.
Your colleague's statement doesn't deserve a serious reply. That would be like saying Holland are better at cricket than NZ, because they beat them once.
The game against Australia was a friendly, and under Sven friendlies are completely meaningless; he uses them as an opportunity to test different players and tactics.
England are a very strong team. The fact that we don't dominate is simply because football is a game played around the world and there are a number of exceptionally strong nations that could win the World Cup; Argentina, Brazil, France, Italy, Spain, Germany, Holland, England -and then a number of strong nations just behind that group; Portugal, Czech Republic, etc.
By contrast, the number of great teams in rugby can be counted on a few fingers.
England usually do well in the major competitions, whereas Australia never qualify (despite being in a qualifying region with the Cook Islands!!!).
Leave a comment:
-
Re: the weather argument
Originally posted by DodgyAgentI do noy buy the weather argument.. countries like Sweden produce top footballers and tennis players, the Netherlands also, as do the Russians.
Australians have warm weather all the year round, so their kids can go out and play impromptu games with their mates any time they like. Think cricket - how often do you see kids in the UK having a knock-about, learning ball-skills at the genuine "grass-roots" level?
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rebecca LoosMmmm... DA, Gunman and Pinto, this sounds to me like a poor excuse to explain defeat.
My EXCUSE for the Lions is simple. They are not a team that trains together and plays together on a regular basis, sure they are some of the best players in the world, but they dont have that team understanding that goes with being part of a national team. That and Sir Clive having too much bias towards has been and out of condition England players over in form Welsh and Irish.
Oh yeah and deliberately breaking our best player was out of order!
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by stackpoleIt's more to do with the bad weather, the lack of space in towns to kick or whack a ball about, the plethora of alternative attractions, the fact that our pool of athletes are spread thinly over more sports than most countries, and the anti-competition brigade, who buggered junior school sports here for a generation. How much "investment" per capita will put that lot right?
Leave a comment:
-
Re: invest far more money per capita?
Originally posted by DodgyAgentHis conclusion purely and simply was that Australia invest far more money per capita in sport than the poms do.
Leave a comment:
-
Boring NZ
and a great lifestyle
and the ability to come over to England for a few years and make tons of money to spend there
and the outdoors
and the food
and stress-free working environments
and great, varied scenery
and... lots more
----------------------------------------------
Why are so many of you lot over here AND never want to go back? All the Kiwis I know are going to live in Aussie after the UK kicks them out...
I have lived in NZ. It is great for a holiday but it is boring as hell, there is no choice, it is far from anywhere, the food is no different to elsewhere(how can this be a plus?), it is full of hillbillies, and it is boring!
What makes me laugh is all these Brits that emmigrate over there and realise living in a periphery country with no clout in the world is not much fun.
Kiwis get very defensive when you slag off their little country - the truth hurts.
Leave a comment:
-
pacific Islanders
Originally posted by Alf WExcuse me but don't New Zealand pick the best players from pretty much the whole of the Pacific Ocean islands? There was talk of putting together a Pacific team for the Tri-Nations which would put the All Blacks back to a similar level to Argentina.
Any, most people just assume people from New Zealand are Aussies anyway.
Leave a comment:
-
Fair enough - I can see how in a way it can seem that the colonies seem to live in some sort of sport oppression.... actually there isn't anything in government policy to force you to be any good at any sport, but there can be a kind of peer / society pressure to do that.... in NZ anyway. In some ways. So maybe yes we are producing lots of good sportsmen, but not many outstanding artists, scientists etc... (Britain does produce lots of them). Maybe sport takes too big a place in NZ and Oz.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rebecca LoosMmmm... DA, Gunman and Pinto, this sounds to me like a poor excuse to explain defeat. Contrary to popular belief, not every Kiwi (can't speak for the Saffos but I know for a fact this is true of the Aussies too) want to become a rugby player (thank God! My school was next to a big rugby-playing school and those guys were horrible)
Also an Aussie colleague of mine just here tells me that even at soccer Australia are better than England as the last time they played, Australia won. Can't comment on that but he seems pretty sure of this fact.
Anyway, DA, what you say is correct but the only valid conclusion to your piece is that English men are not as sporty as Antipodeans. I would agree especially given the number of, errr..., shall we say, well-fed looking men here ;-) (was especially true in Nottingham, more so than London)
Although we Brits like to think that there is more to life than sport, and that it has become oppressive in the colonies, it is an absolute disgrace that sport is so undervalued and underdeveloped in the UK. The reason for this stinks.. it is thanks to socialists who hate competition and competitiveness.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Is an unpaid umbrella company required to pay contractors? Today 09:28
- The truth of umbrella company regulation is being misconstrued Yesterday 09:23
- Labour’s plan to regulate umbrella companies: a closer look Nov 21 09:24
- When HMRC misses an FTT deadline but still wins another CJRS case Nov 20 09:20
- How 15% employer NICs will sting the umbrella company market Nov 19 09:16
- Contracting Awards 2024 hails 19 firms as best of the best Nov 18 09:13
- How to answer at interview, ‘What’s your greatest weakness?’ Nov 14 09:59
- Business Asset Disposal Relief changes in April 2025: Q&A Nov 13 09:37
- How debt transfer rules will hit umbrella companies in 2026 Nov 12 09:28
- IT contractor demand floundering despite Autumn Budget 2024 Nov 11 09:30
Leave a comment: