Originally posted by PAH
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Grand Designs...
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Grand Designs..."
Collapse
-
Not sure how stilts circumvent planning regs, but it's given me an idea:Originally posted by darmstadt View PostI remember a bloke nearby who wanted to build a house and they refused planning permission so he built on stilts (only about 6 inches tall mind you) until the local council caved in
If there's currently no need for planning permission to park a non permanent structure on your own land, why not levitate your newbuild on magnets using similar technology to those trains?
Are there any planning laws against living in a castle in the air?
Leave a comment:
-
I remember a bloke nearby who wanted to build a house and they refused planning permission so he built on stilts (only about 6 inches tall mind you) until the local council caved inOriginally posted by zeitghostThere was another farmer who built a house, got refused planning & buried it.
When they found out they made him dig it up & demolish it.
Leave a comment:
-
Build the thing anyway, then say "whoops!" and offer cash works round my parents way.Originally posted by zeitghostCross his palm with silver... it works wonders around here...
Or just appeal it - the council has to pay the costs of appeals whether they win or lose, which is the blackmail (sorry, argument) being put forward by my old school who were in danger of having their application turned down. "We don't want to appeal, as it will cost the council a lot of money, but..." works a treat.
Leave a comment:
-
How do you subtly hint at the possibility of a bribe if you aren't sure how they're going to respond?
Leave a comment:
-
Nah, just wanted a consultancy fee to help your parents write the application correctly.Originally posted by TonyEnglish View PostWe had 8 pig sheds on our farm which had planning permission to be converted into a house. When my folks submitted plans they were rejected because the house had to be similar in size to the existing building. That meant that it had to be about 10 feet tall at the front and 4 feet tall at the back. The house they were proposing was much nicer than the shabby looking sheds and in keeping with the houses in the area but the local planning bod was just throwing his weight about.
Leave a comment:
-
We had 8 pig sheds on our farm which had planning permission to be converted into a house. When my folks submitted plans they were rejected because the house had to be similar in size to the existing building. That meant that it had to be about 10 feet tall at the front and 4 feet tall at the back. The house they were proposing was much nicer than the shabby looking sheds and in keeping with the houses in the area but the local planning bod was just throwing his weight about.Originally posted by OwlHoot View PostDid you hear about that farmer who spent several years secretly building a castle under a giant haystack?
Much as I disapprove of people building on the countryside without planning permission (or with it come to that), I thought it was so funny he should really be allowed to keep it.
Leave a comment:
-
I was on the weekend sports roundup showing how to ride a MTB. I was really embarrased until I saw it, then thought that technique is really rather good. I ought to make my own movies...Originally posted by zeitghostYou may have a point... I used to be a star myself...
Leave a comment:
-
It was 280 m2 ! Not a palace but pretty big in my book. I didn't like the idea fullstop.Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostI liked the idea of the house, but it needed to be on a much, much grander scale rather than being quite small and having stupidly out-of-scale features like the fireplace and huge TV....
They were the most clueless yet to make it onto Grand Designs, ideal Sarah Beeney fodder but they must be running out of clued up types for Grand Designs. They are nicely saddled with a monster mortgage for many a year and a ropey house.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by zeitghostWhat is it about IT people & property development?

I don't think there's a connection there at all.
The connection is between IT people and "peeps who wanna be on the telly".
tim
Leave a comment:
-
What are you talking about?? The bloke is always criticising the houses. It's one of the reasons why I watch it.Originally posted by Fishface View PostThe Grand designs formula:
Presenter: hmmn, I'm not sure they are going to do it....
cut to last 2 minutes of the show [insert whatever you like]
Presenter: This is great, I love how they... [gushing & more gushing]
NEVER has he said 'this is a pigs ear, what a pair of dickheads!'
Leave a comment:
-
I liked the idea of the house, but it needed to be on a much, much grander scale rather than being quite small and having stupidly out-of-scale features like the fireplace and huge TV.Originally posted by zeitghost View PostOk.
Which one of you lunes was it that built himself a pastiche of the Adams Family House?
Without an architect or project manager or sufficient money?
And making an assumption that the plans (marked "Not to Scale") would be close enough to make accurate measurements for ordering the doors and windows...
Leave a comment:
-
He didn't quite phrases it like that, but he did criticise one development where the guy hadn't finished in a year. And when they did a Revisited programme a year later, he still hadn't finished it. Guy was minted but had no idea about it - building some kind of fancy glass house.Originally posted by Fishface View PostThe Grand designs formula:
Presenter: hmmn, I'm not sure they are going to do it....
cut to last 2 minutes of the show [insert whatever you like]
Presenter: This is great, I love how they... [gushing & more gushing]
NEVER has he said 'this is a pigs ear, what a pair of dickheads!'
Leave a comment:
-
The Grand designs formula:
Presenter: hmmn, I'm not sure they are going to do it....
cut to last 2 minutes of the show [insert whatever you like]
Presenter: This is great, I love how they... [gushing & more gushing]
NEVER has he said 'this is a pigs ear, what a pair of dickheads!'
Leave a comment:
-
Did you hear about that farmer who spent several years secretly building a castle under a giant haystack?
Much as I disapprove of people building on the countryside without planning permission (or with it come to that), I thought it was so funny he should really be allowed to keep it.
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- Why PAYE overcharging by HMRC is every contractor’s problem Today 06:26
- Government unveils ‘Umbrella Company Regulations consultation’ Yesterday 05:55
- JSL rules ‘are HMRC’s way to make contractor umbrella company clients give a sh*t where their money goes’ Feb 8 07:42
- Contractors warned over HMRC charging £3.5 billion too much Feb 6 03:18
- Statutory Sick Pay (SSP) for umbrella company contractors: an April 2026 explainer Feb 5 07:19
- IR35: IT contractors ‘most concerned about off-payroll working rules’ Feb 4 07:11
- Labour’s near-silence on its employment status shakeup is telling, and disappointing Feb 3 07:47
- Business expenses: What IT contractors can and cannot claim from HMRC Jan 30 08:44
- April’s umbrella PAYE risk: how contractors’ end-clients are prepping Jan 29 05:45
- How EV tax changes of 2025-2028 add up for contractor limited company directors Jan 28 08:11

Leave a comment: