• Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
  • Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!

You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:

  • You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
  • You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
  • If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.

Previously on "London Leaseholds - what are the rent/fees ?"

Collapse

  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Fishface View Post
    This freehold - leasehold business is the stuff of fuedal times - the quicker we are in Europe then this bulltulip is abolished.
    If you think that this doesn't exist in the rest of Europe, then think again. It does. (Though not in all countries)

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • tim123
    replied
    Originally posted by Fishface View Post
    Ground rent on a 1920's building 1 bed was 8.59 a quarter with my lease extension has gone up to £232 a year with an instrument to increase it also.
    But that's only from the date of expiry of the remaining 67 years. If you have been advised otherwise you have been advised wrongly.

    tim

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    If you don't re-negotiate what is a 50 year lease now, in 40 years time it will be un-mortgageable and close to worthless.
    Exactly, and if you need to sell it and move on or up, any potential buyer will be thinking the same.

    Leave a comment:


  • OwlHoot
    replied
    Originally posted by Ardesco View Post
    Don't forget you also have a right to buy the freehold. I believe you used to have to live there for a minimum of 3 years. It is slightly more complex with a flat where you have to group together with the other leasehold owners and need at least 25% of the flats in the block to be able to buy it. But it is possible.
    The rules are quite complicated, and in some circs it may not be possible to buy the freehold. For example, you'll have problems if there were less than 20 years remaining on the leases when purchased, or if the freeholder resides in the block, and so in.

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by 2uk View Post
    Coz , after 40 years I can sell the property or give it to my kids ( ) . I've been working my arse out so hard - let the flippers do some thinking and figure out how to pay for the leasehold extension...
    If you don't re-negotiate what is a 50 year lease now, in 40 years time it will be un-mortgageable and close to worthless.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2uk
    replied
    Originally posted by Moscow Mule View Post
    If that's your attitude, why not just rent?
    Coz , after 40 years I can sell the property or give it to my kids ( ) . I've been working my arse out so hard - let the flippers do some thinking and figure out how to pay for the leasehold extension...


    PS.
    Can you say "work my arse out" in this meaning ?

    Leave a comment:


  • Moscow Mule
    replied
    Originally posted by 2uk View Post
    Ok, another question , as I see it, most leaseholds will already be lasting for at least 60 - 70 years ahead. So this means that the property's leasehold is paid for 70 more years by the previous owners. I am assuming this leasehold period will be transferred to me , when I buy the property ?

    Why on earth will I be caring about "leasehold extensions" ? After 50 years I will likely be past caring..
    If that's your attitude, why not just rent?

    Leave a comment:


  • 2uk
    replied
    Ok, another question , as I see it, most leaseholds will already be lasting for at least 60 - 70 years ahead. So this means that the property's leasehold was paid for 70 more years by the previous owners. I am assuming this leasehold period will be transferred to me , when I buy the property ?

    Why on earth will I be caring about "leasehold extensions" ? After 50 years I will likely be past caring..
    Last edited by 2uk; 4 February 2008, 20:54.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bumfluff
    replied
    Originally posted by Dow Jones View Post
    I don't think the picture is as bleak - maybe there are exceptions, but on average a lease extension is negotiable and subject to arbitration if necessary. Ground rent again is charged according to the book, leaving so-called 'service charges' the only point to contest. Remember the landlord is usually a person, the management is run by a company- mostly unconnected to him. Any disputes with the company should always be copied to the landlord, so that he's got a record of all corespondence and disputes.

    Yeah but it all depends on your freeholder and how much of b8stard they are, plus if you disagree with the price of the lease increase it can take years to resolve, even when you use the 'Lease Holder Valuation Tribunaral, the result is not legally binding, you then have to take him to court and pay all his fees.

    I ended up taking a loss to get red of my flat, leasehold properties are depreciating assets are a nightmare pain in the ass.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ardesco
    replied
    Don't forget you also have a right to buy the freehold. I believe you used to have to live there for a minimum of 3 years. It is slightly more complex with a flat where you have to group together with the other leasehold owners and need at least 25% of the flats in the block to be able to buy it. But it is possible.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dow Jones
    replied
    Leaseholds

    I don't think the picture is as bleak - maybe there are exceptions, but on average a lease extension is negotiable and subject to arbitration if necessary. Ground rent again is charged according to the book, leaving so-called 'service charges' the only point to contest. Remember the landlord is usually a person, the management is run by a company- mostly unconnected to him. Any disputes with the company should always be copied to the landlord, so that he's got a record of all corespondence and disputes.

    Leave a comment:


  • Marina
    replied
    2uk, something you definitely should worry about if it's applicable is a head lease. These are becoming more common these days as flats shrink to bonsai proportions!

    Say a freeholder owns several large flats in a block, and wants to split one into two smaller flats. To save having to re-write all existing leases (which will specify percentages of service charges in terms of the existing number of leases), the easiest way to do that is to create a sub lease for one of the new flats subject to the original lease which is then called the head lease and applies to the other flat.

    If you now come along and buy the flat with the head lease, then in taking that on you have technically bought both flats. But you have no beneficial interest in the other one, and are responsible for collecting moneys from the sub-lessee who, in effect, can "hide behind you" in relation to the freeholder.

    So if the sub-lessee works in Outer Mongolia for months on end, or is a chronically late payer or in dispute over the service charge that's a big headache for you!

    And the chances of getting the sub-lease forfeited, so you can take over the other flat, are next to zero these days.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bumfluff
    replied
    First place I bought was a flat lease hold bought it with 80 years on the lease the year the law changed regarding lease extension. I didnt know and socilitor never advised me, below 80 years you have to pay something like 50% of what the property would go up in value to increase the lease. I sold with 76 years on the lease, freehold was a tw*t and even charged me £500 for a licience to to sell the flat, each time a sale fell though and I got another buying it was another £500 for a new licience, even charged me £60 to put new double glazing in.

    I would avoid lease holds if at all possible unless you get a massive lease and some gurantees on the service charge increases. I would never buy leasehold again it was a total nightmare.

    Leave a comment:


  • NoddY
    replied
    Suddenly property doesn't look so hot. Maybe the 'asset' isn't one after all. Enjoy the squeeze.

    Leave a comment:


  • 2uk
    replied
    So that means , a leasehold property's price should also be impacted by the current lease expiration date... anyway , thanks very helpful

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X