Originally posted by tay
View Post
- Visitors can check out the Forum FAQ by clicking this link. You have to register before you can post: click the REGISTER link above to proceed. To start viewing messages, select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below. View our Forum Privacy Policy.
- Want to receive the latest contracting news and advice straight to your inbox? Sign up to the ContractorUK newsletter here. Every sign up will also be entered into a draw to WIN £100 Amazon vouchers!
Reply to: Mf
Collapse
You are not logged in or you do not have permission to access this page. This could be due to one of several reasons:
- You are not logged in. If you are already registered, fill in the form below to log in, or follow the "Sign Up" link to register a new account.
- You may not have sufficient privileges to access this page. Are you trying to edit someone else's post, access administrative features or some other privileged system?
- If you are trying to post, the administrator may have disabled your account, or it may be awaiting activation.
Logging in...
Previously on "Mf"
Collapse
-
this board misses you
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by milanbenes View PostI would have shown you a link but it looks like MF doesn't maintain his website anymore.
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by TheFaQQer View PostOne man's rubbish is another man's treasure.
Just because MF deems it tat does not make it so - for example, I would regard some Murano glass ornaments or Ditchfield paperweights as ugly tat. However, the general market for such things would indicate that I would not be right adopting that position.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
I would have shown you a link but it looks like MF doesn't maintain his website anymore.
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
FAQ,
believe me, if you saw MF's tat, you would indeed agree, it is tat.
Hence the name, tat.
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by milanbenes View Postit is tat, hence the name tat
apologies if that is a little hard to comprehend stu
Milan.
Just because MF deems it tat does not make it so - for example, I would regard some Murano glass ornaments or Ditchfield paperweights as ugly tat. However, the general market for such things would indicate that I would not be right adopting that position.
HTH.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Xenophon View PostI feel your pain with the council tax, MF. Mine is £2435 p.a.
Leave a comment:
-
it is tat, hence the name tat
apologies if that is a little hard to comprehend stu
Milan.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by MarillionFan View PostOnly work in California for a couple of weeks at a time.
Took a perm job as they matched my contract take home and added some shares.
Had paid off my house and had cash in the bank, so used my new salary to buy a ******* big house with a view that my shares will pay it off in the next four years if I dont get fired!!!
Now too busy to sell tat, but have loads if you want some.
Buy it all for a small nominal fee
or
Sell it for you on eBay for a %
?
Leave a comment:
- Home
- News & Features
- First Timers
- IR35 / S660 / BN66
- Employee Benefit Trusts
- Agency Workers Regulations
- MSC Legislation
- Limited Companies
- Dividends
- Umbrella Company
- VAT / Flat Rate VAT
- Job News & Guides
- Money News & Guides
- Guide to Contracts
- Successful Contracting
- Contracting Overseas
- Contractor Calculators
- MVL
- Contractor Expenses
Advertisers
Contractor Services
CUK News
- IR35: Control — updated for 2025-26 Yesterday 21:28
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 20:17
- Can a WhatsApp message really be a contract? Sep 25 08:17
- ‘Subdued’ IT contractor jobs market took third tumble in a row in August Sep 25 08:07
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 24 05:05
- Are CVs medieval or just being misused? Sep 23 21:05
- IR35: Mutuality Of Obligations — updated for 2025/26 Sep 23 05:22
- Only proactive IT contractors can survive recruitment firm closures Sep 22 07:32
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 19 07:16
- How should a creditors’ meeting ideally pan out for unpaid suppliers? Sep 18 21:16
Leave a comment: